Robinson v. GC Services, LP
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER re: 10 for Leave to File Amended Answer to Complaint signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/13/13. (Meuleman, A)
DAVID I. DALBY (SBN: 114750)
ddalby@hinshawlaw.com
2 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
One California Street, 18th Floor
3 San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415-362-6000
4 Facsimile:
415-834-9070
1
5
Attorneys for Defendant
GC SERVICES, LP.
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
MICHAELA ROBINSON
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
GC SERVICES, LP.
16
Defendants.
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:13-cv-00627-GEB-AC
STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT;
ORDER
Complaint Filed:
February 11, 2013
19
20
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP), Rule 83 and Local Rule 143, by
21
and through their respective counsel of record, plaintiff Michaela Robinson and Defendant GC
22
Services LP hereby stipulate that GC Services LP has leave to file an amended answer to
23
plaintiff's complaint. A copy of the proposed amended answer is attached to this stipulation as
24
Exhibit A. The proposed amended answer includes a more specific reference to GC Services
25
LP's statutory defenses of bona fide error as set forth in the fourteenth and fifteenth affirmative
26
defenses.
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER; [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00627-GEB-AC
3276500v1 0944843
1
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
2
3
DATED: November 13, 2013
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
4
5
: By:__/s/ David Ian Dalby__________________
6
David I. Dalby
Attorneys for Defendant
GC SERVICES, LP.
7
8
DATED: November 13, 2013
LAW OFFICES OF TODD FREIDMAN PC
9
10
: By:___/s/ Todd M. Friedman_______________
11
Todd M. Friedman
Attorney for Plaintiff MICHAELA
ROBINSON
12
13
14
15
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: November 13, 2013
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER; [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00627-GEB-AC
3276500v1 0944843
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?