Luman v. New Vitality Corp. et al
Filing
64
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/1/16 ORDERING that the Status Conference and the Motion to Dismiss hearing is RESET from 8/26/2016 to 9/9/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The parties do not need to file a new joint status report. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)
Annick M. Persinger (State Bar No. 272996)
1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: (925) 300-4455
Facsimile: (925) 407-2700
E-Mail: ltfisher@bursor.com
apersinger@bursor.com
BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006)
888 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: (212) 989-9113
Facsimile: (212) 989-9163
E-Mail: scott@bursor.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
JOEL AMKRAUT, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
v.
NAC MARKETING COMPANY, LLC d/b/a
NEW VITALITY,
Case No. 13-CV-00656-KJM-AC
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS
CONFERENCE AND MOTION TO
DISMISS HEARING FROM AUGUST
26, 2016 TO SEPTEMBER 9, 2016
Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller
19
Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND MOTION TO DISMISS HEARING
CASE NO. 13-CV-00656-KJM-AC
1
2
3
4
ORDER
Good cause having been shown in the parties’ stipulation, the Court hereby ORDERS that
the Status Conference and motion to dismiss hearing is reset from August 26, 2016 to September 9,
2016 at 10:00 a.m. The parties do not need to file a new joint status report.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 1, 2016
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND MOTION TO DISMISS HEARING
CASE NO. 13-CV-00656-KJM-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?