Banga v. Gundumolgula et al

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/11/2013: The 8/7/2013 hearing date on defendants Vexatious Litigant Motion (ECF No. 13 ) is vacated. Plaintiff shall file opposition to the vexatious litigant motion no later than July 24, 20 13. Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than July 31, 2013. Defendants motion to dismiss shall thereafter stand submitted. This action is stayed as against defendants Gundumolgula, Anolik, and Sheen Travel pending resolution of the vexatious litigant motion. (Owen, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAMLESH BANGA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-0667 MCE CKD PS v. ORDER PRASAD GUNDUMOLGULA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Defendants have filed a motion to have plaintiff declared a vexatious litigant. Upon 17 18 review of the docket in this matter, the court has determined that the action should be stayed as 19 against defendants Gundumolgula, Anolik, and Sheen Travel pending resolution of the vexatious 20 litigant motion. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. The hearing date on defendants’ motion (ECF No. 13) is vacated. 23 2. Plaintiff shall file opposition to the vexatious litigant motion no later than July 24, 24 2013.1 3. Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than July 31, 2013. Defendants’ motion to dismiss 25 26 27 28 shall thereafter stand submitted. 1 Plaintiff is reminded that the sur-reply, if any, to defendant Emirates Airlines’ motion to dismiss must be filed no later than July 17, 2013. 1 1 4. This action is stayed as against defendants Gundumolgula, Anolik, and Sheen Travel 2 pending resolution of the vexatious litigant motion. 3 Dated: July 11, 2013 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 4 banga667.sub 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?