Banga v. Gundumolgula et al
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/11/2013: The 8/7/2013 hearing date on defendants Vexatious Litigant Motion (ECF No. 13 ) is vacated. Plaintiff shall file opposition to the vexatious litigant motion no later than July 24, 20 13. Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than July 31, 2013. Defendants motion to dismiss shall thereafter stand submitted. This action is stayed as against defendants Gundumolgula, Anolik, and Sheen Travel pending resolution of the vexatious litigant motion. (Owen, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KAMLESH BANGA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-0667 MCE CKD PS
v.
ORDER
PRASAD GUNDUMOLGULA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Defendants have filed a motion to have plaintiff declared a vexatious litigant. Upon
17
18
review of the docket in this matter, the court has determined that the action should be stayed as
19
against defendants Gundumolgula, Anolik, and Sheen Travel pending resolution of the vexatious
20
litigant motion.
21
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
22
1. The hearing date on defendants’ motion (ECF No. 13) is vacated.
23
2. Plaintiff shall file opposition to the vexatious litigant motion no later than July 24,
24
2013.1
3. Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than July 31, 2013. Defendants’ motion to dismiss
25
26
27
28
shall thereafter stand submitted.
1
Plaintiff is reminded that the sur-reply, if any, to defendant Emirates Airlines’ motion to
dismiss must be filed no later than July 17, 2013.
1
1
4. This action is stayed as against defendants Gundumolgula, Anolik, and Sheen Travel
2
pending resolution of the vexatious litigant motion.
3
Dated: July 11, 2013
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
4 banga667.sub
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?