Landslide Communications et al v. State of California et al

Filing 14

NON-RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/24/13 ORDERING the court is in receipt of the Notice of Related Cases concerning the above-captioned cases filed 4/15/13. After consideration, the court has determined that it is i nappropriate to relate or reassign the cases, and therefore declines to do so. This order is issued for informational purposes only, and shall have no effect on the status of the cases, including any previous Related (or Non-Related) Case Order of this court. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CALIFORNIA PROLIFE COUNCIL
POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE,

12
Plaintiff,
13
v.

CIV. NO. S-96-1965 LKK/DAD

14
JAN SCULLY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
/

16
17

LARRY LEVINE; TOM KAPTAIN;
SCOTT HART; and CALIFORNIA
REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLY,

18
Plaintiffs,
19
v.

CIV. NO. S-02-0199 LKK/DAD

20
21

FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES
COMMISSION,
Defendant.

22

/
23
24

////

25

////

26

////

1
2
3

LANDSLIDE COMMUNICATIONS,
INC. and JAMES V. LACY,
IN HIS CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT
OF LANDSLIDE COMMUNICATIONS,
INC.,

4

Plaintiffs,

5

v.

6
7

CIV. NO. S-13-0716 GEB/KJN

STATE OF CALIFORNIA; FAIR
POLITICAL PRACTICES
COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,

8

NON-RELATED CASE ORDER
Defendants.

9

/

10

The court is in receipt of the Notice of Related Cases

11

concerning the above-captioned cases filed April 15, 2013.

12

consideration, the court has determined that it is inappropriate

13

to relate or reassign the cases, and therefore declines to do so.

14

This order is issued for informational purposes only, and shall

15

have no effect on the status of the cases, including any previous

16

Related (or Non-Related) Case Order of this court.

17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18

DATED:

May 24, 2013.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2

After