Thiessen v. Knipp et al

Filing 25

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/14/2014 ORDERING petitioner to show cause, within 21 days, why his failure to oppose respondents' 12/18/13 motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and he shall file an opposition. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SANDOR TORRES THIESSEN,

12

Petitioner,

13
14

No. 2:13-cv-0722 LKK KJN P

v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

WILLIAM KNIPP, et al.,

15

Respondents.

16
17

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas

18

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 18, 2013, respondents filed a motion to

19

dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part:

20

“Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition

21

may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .”
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within

22
23

twenty-one days, why his failure to oppose respondents’ December 18, 2013 motion to dismiss

24

should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and he shall file

25

an opposition. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, or to file an

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that this action be

2

dismissed.

3

Dated: January 14, 2014

4
5

/thie0722.46h

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2