Hoang et al v. Vinh Phat Supermarket et al

Filing 47

STIPULATION and ORDER 45 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/17/2014 extending Third-Party Defendant Muoi Lam's time to respond to the Third-Party Complaint filed by Third-Party Plaintiffs Suying Plaskett, Sau Vong, and Chan Cam Ly until 2/18/2014. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LOCKE LORD LLP John P. Yung, SBN 201292 Krista J. Dunzweiler, SBN 227384 Daniel A. King, SBN 258524 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1800 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916)930-2500 Facsimile: (916)930-2500 jyung@lockelord.com kdunzweiler@lockelord.com dking@lockelord.com Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant, MUOI LAM 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Locke Lord LLP 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1800 Sacramento, CA 95814 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 CASE NO. 2:13-cv-00724-WBS-EFB JEANETTE HOANG, YUN WU, GUANG GU XIANG, MENGTING FANNY KUO, GIA NHAM THANH, EDMOND CAU VAN, GAO ZHI WEI, DANNY HUNG LEUNG, YE-GUI BU, and COOC MAN COONG, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiffs, v. VINH PHAT SUPERMARKET, INC., a California Corporation; SAU V. VONG, as an individual; CAM LY, as an individual; SUYING PLASKETT, as an individual; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Defendants. AND RELATED ACTIONS 23 24 25 Whereas, Third-Party Plaintiffs Suying Plaskett, Sau Vong, and Cam Ly (aka Chan Cam Ly) 26 (collectively “Third Party Plaintiffs”) and Third-Party Defendant Muoi Lam (“Third-Party 27 Defendant”) previously stipulated to extend the time for Third-Party Defendant to respond to the 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Third-Party Complaint to November 27, 2013, pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), in order to pursue 2 alternative dispute resolution. 3 Whereas, Third Party Plaintiffs and Third-Party Defendant previously stipulated to extend 4 the deadline to respond to thirty days following mediation in order to enable all parties in the action 5 to participate in a mediation, which the Court approved by Order on or about November 20, 2013. 6 Whereas, all parties to the entire action participated in a mediation on December 17, 2013, 7 wherein the parties to the original complaint in this matter agreed to settle their claims against 8 Defendants Vinh Phat Supermarket, Suying Plaskett, Sau Vong, and Cam Ly. 9 Whereas, the parties to this stipulation are continuing to work towards final resolution of the 10 Third-Party Complaint as an extension of the mediation process, following the settlement of the 11 claims by the Plaintiffs. Locke Lord LLP 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1800 Sacramento, CA 95814 12 Whereas, both sides wish to avoid burdening the Court with and incurring the expense of 13 motion practice, including, without limitation motion practice under Rule 12(b)(6), concerning the 14 Third-Party Complaint, which Third-Party Defendant will file should the parties fail to resolve the 15 dispute as between these parties. 16 17 18 19 20 Whereas, this Stipulation is entered pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 6 and Local Rule 144(a). Therefore, Third-Party Plaintiffs and Third-Party Defendant hereby stipulate that Third-Party Defendant shall have until February 18, 2014 to respond to the Third Party Complaint. Third-Party Plaintiffs and Third-Party Defendant also hereby respectfully request the Court 21 issue the attached [Proposed] Order so extending Third-Party Plaintiff’s time to respond. 22 SO STIPULATED 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Dated: January 16, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 2 LOCKE LORD LLP 3 4 By: /s/ Daniel A. King DANIEL A. KING Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant MUOI LAM 5 6 7 8 9 10 Dated: Dated: January 16, 2014 SEGAL & KIRBY LLP 11 By: /s/ John T. Kinn JOHN T. KINN Attorneys for Third-Party Plaintiffs SAU V. VONG, CAM LY, and SUYING PLASKETT Locke Lord LLP 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1800 Sacramento, CA 95814 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Orde er 2 For good cause shown the Court hereby exte nds Third-P n, Party Defend Muoi La dant am’s time to 3 ond hird-Party Co omplaint file by Thirded -Party Plaint tiffs Suying P Plaskett, Sau Vong, and u respo to the Th 4 Chan Cam Ly on August 26, 2013 in the above captioned matter (Docket No 31) until F n n r o. February 18, 5 2014. 6 Dated January 17, 2014 d: 1 7 8 9 10 11 Locke Lord LLP 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1800 Sacramento CA 95814 Sacramento, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATI ION AND [PR ROPOSED] OR RDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?