Smith v. Rahman

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/19/13 DENYING without prejudice 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRELL SMITH, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:13-cv-0738 KJN P vs. ABDUL RAHMAN, Defendant. ORDER / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel or “pro se” in an action 17 brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff requests that the court appoint counsel. District courts 18 lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. 19 United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court 20 may request an attorney to voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); 21 Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 22 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the 23 court must consider plaintiff’s likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the 24 plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. 25 Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (district court did not abuse discretion in 26 declining to appoint counsel). The burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances is on the 1 1 plaintiff. Id. Circumstances common to most prisoners, such as lack of legal education and 2 limited law library access, do not establish exceptional circumstances that warrant a request for 3 voluntary assistance of counsel. Having considered the factors under Palmer, the court finds that plaintiff has 4 5 failed to meet his burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances warranting the 6 appointment of counsel at this time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s April 15, 2013 motion 7 8 for the appointment of counsel (dkt. no. 2) is denied without prejudice. 9 DATED: April 19, 2013 10 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 smit0738.31.kjn 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?