Rainey v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., et al

Filing 8

MDL CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER, CASE TRANSFERRED to Northern District of Texas re: MDL No. 2244; case Number 3:11-md-2244-K. (Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
Case 3:11-md-02244-K 2244 Document Filed 05/15/13 Page 1 of 3 1PageID 4082 Case MDL No. Document 297 1048 Filed 05/15/13 Page of 3 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FILED May 15, 2013 IN RE: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., PINNACLE HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MDL No. 2244 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −135) On May 23, 2011, the Panel transferred 3 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407. See 787 F.Supp.2d 1358 (J.P.M.L. 2011). Since that time, 907 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Texas. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable James Edgar Kinkeade. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Texas and assigned to Judge Kinkeade. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the Northern District of Texas for the reasons stated in the order of May 23, 2011, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable James Edgar Kinkeade. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: May 15, 2013 Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel By s/*PAIGE LESSOR DEPUTY CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS May 15, 2013 Case 3:11-md-02244-K 2244 Document Filed 05/15/13 Page 2 of 3 2PageID 4083 Case MDL No. Document 297 1048 Filed 05/15/13 Page of 3 IN RE: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., PINNACLE HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2244 SCHEDULE CTO−135 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION ALABAMA NORTHERN ALN ALN ALN ALN ALN 2 2 2 2 6 13−00653 13−00654 13−00655 13−00656 13−00657 Burnham v. Johnson &Johnson Inc et al Demarsico v. Johnson &Johnson Inc et al Nelson v. Johnson &Johnson Inc et al Wallerich v. Johnson &Johnson Inc et al Yeager v. Johnson &Johnson Inc et al 2 13−00670 Petersen v. DePuy Orthopaedics Incorporated et al ARIZONA AZ CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC CAC 2 2 13−02733 13−02754 Robert Severson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al Wayne Novotny et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE 2 13−00774 Rainey v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., et al CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 13−01824 Elson v. Johnson &Johnson Services, Inc. et al FLORIDA SOUTHERN FLS FLS 0 0 13−60884 13−60885 Sloan v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al McJimsey v. Johnson &Johnson, Inc. et al INDIANA NORTHERN INN 3 13−00322 LOUISIANA EASTERN Duross v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al Case 3:11-md-02244-K 2244 Document Filed 05/15/13 Page 3 of 3 3PageID 4084 Case MDL No. Document 297 1048 Filed 05/15/13 Page of 3 LAE 2 13−02522 Clark v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al 13−00994 13−00995 13−00996 Schaedel v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al Watson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al Miller v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al MINNESOTA MN MN MN 0 0 0 MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN MSN 1 13−00073 Newell v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al MISSOURI WESTERN MOW 2 13−04107 Church v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al NEW YORK NORTHERN NYN 1 13−00413 Fick et al v. Johnson &Johnson Services, LLC et al 11−20605 Walsh v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al OHIO NORTHERN OHN 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?