Bluet-Harrison v. GMRI, Inc. et al
Filing
59
STIPULATION and ORDER #58 for continuance signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/21/2014. Defendants' #53 Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing is RE-SET for 12/11/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN). (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
BRIANA BLUET-HARRISON,
individually, and on behalf of other
members of the general public similarly
situated,
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
15
GMRI, INC. d/b/a Red Lobster, a
Florida corporation; DARDEN
RESTAURANTS, INC., a Florida
corporation; and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
16
17
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
633 West 5th Street
63rd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
213.443.4300
ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MSJ AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
Case No. CV13-00777-TLN-AC
ORDER CONTINUING THE
HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
CLASS CERTIFICATION
1
ORDER
2
The Court has read and considered the parties’ Joint Stipulation to
3
Continue the Hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the
4
alternative, Partial Summary Judgment and Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification.
5
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the hearing for Defendants’ Motion for
6
Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment and Plaintiff’s
7
Motion for Class Certification is re-scheduled for December 11, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
Dated: October 21, 2014
14
15
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
633 West 5th Street
63rd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
213.443.4300
ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MSJ AND PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
FOR CLASS
2.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?