Bluet-Harrison v. GMRI, Inc. et al

Filing 59

STIPULATION and ORDER #58 for continuance signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/21/2014. Defendants' #53 Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing is RE-SET for 12/11/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN). (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 BRIANA BLUET-HARRISON, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, Plaintiff, 13 14 v. 15 GMRI, INC. d/b/a Red Lobster, a Florida corporation; DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC., a Florida corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 16 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 633 West 5th Street 63rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 213.443.4300 ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MSJ AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION Case No. CV13-00777-TLN-AC ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 1 ORDER 2 The Court has read and considered the parties’ Joint Stipulation to 3 Continue the Hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the 4 alternative, Partial Summary Judgment and Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification. 5 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the hearing for Defendants’ Motion for 6 Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment and Plaintiff’s 7 Motion for Class Certification is re-scheduled for December 11, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 Dated: October 21, 2014 14 15 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 633 West 5th Street 63rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 213.443.4300 ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MSJ AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION FOR CLASS 2.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?