Jackson v. Traquina et al

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/23/2015 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

WALTER JACKSON,

11

No. 2:13-cv-0781 KJN P

Plaintiff,

12

v.

ORDER

13

ALVARO TRAQUINA, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
By order filed November 17, 2014, plaintiff’s second amended complaint was dismissed

16
17

and thirty days leave to file a third amended complaint was granted. (ECF No. 13.) That order

18

also provided, “Failure of plaintiff to timely file a Third Amended Complaint in accordance with

19

this order will result in the dismissal of this action.” (Id. at 8.) More than thirty days have now

20

passed, and plaintiff has not filed a third amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the

21

court’s order.
Plaintiff previously consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned in this matter. (ECF

22
23
24

No. 4.)
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

25

See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

26

Dated: January 23, 2015

27
/jack0781.fta

28
1