Waldo v. Eli Lilly & Company

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/30/13 ORDERING Defendant's motion to dismiss is currently set for hearing on 10/7/13. (ECF No. 18 .)The court does not find oral argument to be necessary and will decide the motion on the papers. Accordingly, the hearing on the motion is VACATED. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

ANGELA WALDO, individually
and as Natural Parent of
D.P.,

13
14
15

Plaintiff,

No. CIV. S-13-0789 LKK/EFB

ORDER

v.
ELI LILLY & COMPANY,

16

Defendant.

17
18
19
20

Defendant’s motion to dismiss is currently set for hearing
on October 7, 2013.

(ECF No. 18.)

The court does not find oral argument to be necessary and

21

will decide the motion on the papers.

22

on the motion is VACATED.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

DATED:

September 30, 2013.

25
26
27
28
1

Accordingly, the hearing