Waldo v. Eli Lilly & Company

Filing 42

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/7/14 ORDERING that Defendant's MOTION to DISMISS 38 is currently set for hearing on 1/13/14. The court does not find oral argument to be necessary and will decide the motion on the papers. Accordingly, the hearing on the motion is VACATED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 ANGELA WALDO, individually and as Natural Parent of D.P., 13 14 15 Plaintiff, No. CIV. S-13-0789 LKK/EFB ORDER v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 Defendant’s motion to dismiss is currently set for hearing on January 13, 2014. (ECF No. 38.) The court does not find oral argument to be necessary and 21 will decide the motion on the papers. 22 on the motion is VACATED. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 DATED: January 7, 2014. 25 26 27 28 1 Accordingly, the hearing

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?