Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Maverick Auto Group 2 LLC, et al

Filing 33

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/9/2015 VACATING 27 Judgment; DISMISSING the 1 Complaint and any and all claims for relief with prejudice. (cc: Ninth Circuit) (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
  1 2 3 4 5 6 Christian J. Scali, Esq. (SBN 193785) THE SCALI LAW FIRM 800 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 Phone No.: (213) 239-5622 Fax No.: (213) 239-5623 Attorney for Defendants, MAVERICK AUTO GROUP 2, LLC, dba VOLKSWAGEN OF FAIRFIELD and RAHIM HASSANALLY 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC., Case No. 2:13-CV-00802-JAM-EFB Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 15 MAVERICK AUTO GROUP 2, LLC, dba VOLKSWAGEN OF FAIRFIELD and RAHIM HASSANALLY, 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE THE JUDGMENT AND DISMISS THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Defendants. 14 17 18 19 Plaintiff, Volkswagen of America, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Maverick 20 Auto Group 2, LLC dba Volkswagen of Fairfield and Rahim Hassanally (collectively 21 “Defendants”) (Volkswagen and Defendants referred to collectively as the “Parties”) 22 hereby submit the following stipulation to vacate the judgment and dismiss the above- 23 captioned matter with prejudice. 24 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in the United States District Court for 25 the Eastern District of California – Sacramento Division, alleging causes of action for 26 Breach of Contract and Breach of Guarantee (“Complaint”) against Defendants on or 27 about April 24, 2013; 28 00027309.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO VACATE THE JUDGMENT AND DISMISS THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE   1 WHEREAS this Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and 2 entered judgment against the Defendants on or about December 11, 2014 3 (“Judgment”); and, 4 WHEREAS the Parties subsequently reached an agreement regarding the 5 dispute that is the subject of the Complaint and Judgment, thereby resolving this action 6 and related disputes entirely. 7 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the 8 Parties that the Judgment be vacated and that the above-captioned action is dismissed 9 with prejudice. See, Fed. R. Civ. P. Rules 41 and 60. 10 11 DATED: March 6, 2015 THE SCALI LAW FIRM BY: /s/ Christian J. Scali, Esq. Christian J. Scali, Esq. Attorney for Defendants, MAVERICK AUTO GROUP 2, LLC, dba VOLKSWAGEN OF FAIRFIELD and RAHIM HASSANALLY DATED: March 6, 2015 NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY: S/Paul T. Collins Paul T. Collins, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff, VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 00027309.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO VACATE THE JUDGMENT AND DISMISS THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE   1 ORDER 2 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Judgment entered on or about December 4 11, 2014 is vacated and that the Complaint and any and all claims for relief in the 5 above-captioned matter, U.S.D.C. E.D.Cal. Case No. 2:13-cv-00802-JAM-EFB, are 6 hereby dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 DATED: 3/9/2015 10 /s/ John A. Mendez__________________________ HON JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 00027309.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO VACATE THE JUDGMENT AND DISMISS THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?