Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Maverick Auto Group 2 LLC, et al
Filing
33
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/9/2015 VACATING 27 Judgment; DISMISSING the 1 Complaint and any and all claims for relief with prejudice. (cc: Ninth Circuit) (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Christian J. Scali, Esq. (SBN 193785)
THE SCALI LAW FIRM
800 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Phone No.: (213) 239-5622
Fax No.: (213) 239-5623
Attorney for Defendants,
MAVERICK AUTO GROUP 2, LLC,
dba VOLKSWAGEN OF FAIRFIELD
and RAHIM HASSANALLY
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION
10
11
VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC.,
Case No. 2:13-CV-00802-JAM-EFB
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
15
MAVERICK AUTO GROUP 2, LLC,
dba VOLKSWAGEN OF FAIRFIELD
and RAHIM HASSANALLY,
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
VACATE THE JUDGMENT AND
DISMISS THIS ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE
Defendants.
14
17
18
19
Plaintiff, Volkswagen of America, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Maverick
20
Auto Group 2, LLC dba Volkswagen of Fairfield and Rahim Hassanally (collectively
21
“Defendants”) (Volkswagen and Defendants referred to collectively as the “Parties”)
22
hereby submit the following stipulation to vacate the judgment and dismiss the above-
23
captioned matter with prejudice.
24
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in the United States District Court for
25
the Eastern District of California – Sacramento Division, alleging causes of action for
26
Breach of Contract and Breach of Guarantee (“Complaint”) against Defendants on or
27
about April 24, 2013;
28
00027309.1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO VACATE THE JUDGMENT
AND DISMISS THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
1
WHEREAS this Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and
2
entered judgment against the Defendants on or about December 11, 2014
3
(“Judgment”); and,
4
WHEREAS the Parties subsequently reached an agreement regarding the
5
dispute that is the subject of the Complaint and Judgment, thereby resolving this action
6
and related disputes entirely.
7
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the
8
Parties that the Judgment be vacated and that the above-captioned action is dismissed
9
with prejudice. See, Fed. R. Civ. P. Rules 41 and 60.
10
11
DATED: March 6, 2015
THE SCALI LAW FIRM
BY: /s/ Christian J. Scali, Esq.
Christian J. Scali, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants,
MAVERICK AUTO GROUP 2, LLC, dba
VOLKSWAGEN OF FAIRFIELD and
RAHIM HASSANALLY
DATED: March 6, 2015
NELSON MULLINS RILEY &
SCARBOROUGH, LLP
12
13
14
15
16
17
BY: S/Paul T. Collins
Paul T. Collins, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff,
VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
00027309.1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO VACATE THE JUDGMENT
AND DISMISS THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
1
ORDER
2
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Judgment entered on or about December
4
11, 2014 is vacated and that the Complaint and any and all claims for relief in the
5
above-captioned matter, U.S.D.C. E.D.Cal. Case No. 2:13-cv-00802-JAM-EFB, are
6
hereby dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
DATED: 3/9/2015
10
/s/ John A. Mendez__________________________
HON JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
00027309.1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO VACATE THE JUDGMENT
AND DISMISS THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?