St. Clair v. Schlachter
Filing
70
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/18/16 ORDERING pursuant to the parties' Joint Stipulation to Allow Limited Discovery Beyond the 5/15/16 discovery deadline, ECF No. 69 , the court GRANTS the parties' request to conduct the depositions of Dr. Victoria Pickering and Linda Strickland beyond the 5/15/16 discovery deadline, nunc pro tunc. The depositions shall be conducted as soon as practicable without requiring any other change in the schedule of the case. (Becknal, R)
5
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
Matthew J. Vanis (SBN 210706)
mvanis@shb.com
Edward B. Gaus (SBN 289561)
egaus@shb.com
One Montgomery, Suite 2700
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: 415-544-1900
Facsimile: 415-391-0281
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff Jimmy St. Clair
1
2
3
4
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
JIMMY ST. CLAIR,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
STAN SCHLACHTER,
Defendant.
16
CASE NO. No. 2:13-CV-00804-KJM-EFB
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
GRANT LEAVE TO DEPOSE DR. VICTORIA
PICKERING AND LINDA STRICKLAND
BEYOND THE MAY 15, 2016 DISCOVERY
CUTOFF
17
18
19
20
Pursuant to Local Rule 143, 144, 230 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 29, the parties
21
submit this Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order to Continue the May 15, 2016 discovery deadline
22
for the limited purpose of deposing Dr. Victoria Pickering and Linda Strickland.
23
1.
24
15, 2016.
25
2.
26
Since the Court’s order extending the deadline, the parties have worked diligently to
locate and depose Dr. Pickering and Ms. Strickland.
3.
27
28
On April 4, 2016, the Court issued an order extending the discovery deadline to May
Dr. Pickering was previously on leave from her employment at Mule Creek State
Prison.
344675 v2
JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO DEPOSE PICKERING AND STRICKLAND
CASE NO. No. 2:13-CV-00804-KJM-EFB
1
4.
Throughout March of 2016, the parties attempted to work with the litigation
2
coordinator at Mule Creek State Prison, Desiree Azevedo, to determine when Dr. Pickering would
3
return to work and whether the parties could schedule her deposition.
4
5.
Despite repeated attempts to accommodate Dr. Pickering’s schedule, the parties were
5
informed that Dr. Pickering felt it would not be in her best interest to participate in a deposition until
6
she returned from work in June of 2016.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
6.
Following Dr. Pickering’s response, the parties proposed taking Dr. Pickering’s
deposition by written questions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 31.
7.
On March 11, 2016, Ms. Azevedo responded by inquiring as to whether the
deposition by written questions could be conducted over the telephone.
8.
On March 14, 2016, the parties informed Ms. Azevedo that there was no objection to
the deposition being conducted telephonically.
9.
On March 15, 2016, Ms. Azevedo responded that Dr. Pickering did not have access to
14
her case notes and that “it would probably be best to wait to schedule the deposition once she is
15
cleared to return to work.”
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
10.
Following the Court’s April 4, 2016 order, the parties followed up with Ms. Azevedo
regarding Dr. Pickering’s availability.
11.
Ms. Azevedo informed the parties that Dr. Pickering would be available for
deposition on May 13, 2016.
12.
The parties agreed on this dates and Dr. Pickering’s deposition was scheduled for
May 13, 2016. See Exhibit A.
13.
On May 10, 2016, Ms. Azevedo informed the parties that Dr. Pickering had to
reschedule her deposition due to a conflict.
14.
Both parties agree that Dr. Pickering’s deposition is necessary to fully evaluate each
side’s respective case.
15.
The parties, Ms. Azevedo and Dr. Pickering have tentatively agreed on May 19,, 2016
as an alternative date for her deposition at Mule Creek State Prison, subject to the Court’s approval.
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO DEPOSE PICKERING AND STRICKLAND
344675 v2
CASE NO. No. 2:13-CV-00804-KJM-EFB
16.
1
2
former investigator at the Department of Consumer Affairs.
17.
3
4
18.
Since December 11, 2015, Plaintiff has diligently searched for Ms. Strickland
throughout California.
19.
7
8
On December 11, 2015, Plaintiff was informed that Ms. Strickland no longer worked
at the Department of Consumer Affairs.
5
6
On November 18, 2015, Plaintiff served a deposition subpoena on Linda Strickland, a
The parties agreed to schedule Mrs. Strickland’s deposition for May 9, 2016,
provided she could be located and served with a deposition subpoena.
9
20.
On April 29, 2016, Plaintiff’s process server found the correct Linda Strickland living
10
in Galt, California.
11
21.
On April 29, 2016, Plaintiff’s process server was informed by Plaintiff’s husband that
12
Linda was in San Diego caring for her elderly mother. Ms. Strickland’s husband refused service of
13
the deposition subpoena as well. See Exhibit B.
22.
14
Between May 1 and May 6, 2016, Plaintiff’s counsel Edward Gaus called the
15
Strickland’s home 5 times in an effort to attempt to speak with someone there regarding Ms.
16
Strickland’s availability. He never received a return phone call.
23.
17
18
Both parties agree that the deposition of Ms. Strickland is directly relevant to the
issues in this case and is necessary to each side’s full evaluation of their respective case.
24.
19
Subject to the Court’s approval, the parties will continue to attempt to contact Ms.
20
Strickland to determine an agreeable date to schedule her deposition as soon as is practicable for all
21
interested parties.
22
For the foregoing reasons, the parties respectfully request an order granting leave for the
23
parties to conduct the depositions of Dr. Pickering and Linda Strickland beyond the May 15, 2016
24
discovery deadline.
25
/////
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
2
JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO DEPOSE PICKERING AND STRICKLAND
344675 v2
CASE NO. No. 2:13-CV-00804-KJM-EFB
1
Dated: May 12, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
2
3
By:
4
5
___/s/ Edward B. Gaus_________________
Matthew Vanis
Edward Gaus
Attorney for Plaintiff JIMMY ST. CLAIR
6
7
Dated: May 12, 2016
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH L.L.P.
8
9
By:
10
11
/s/ Nicole L. Jones (as authorized on 5/12/16)
Christopher J. Nevis
Nicole L. Jones
Attorney for Defendant STAN SCHLACHTER
12
13
14
ORDER
15
16
Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Allow Limited Discovery Beyond the May 15,
17
2016 discovery deadline, ECF No. 69, the court GRANTS the parties’ request to conduct the
18
depositions of Dr. Victoria Pickering and Linda Strickland beyond the May 15, 2016 discovery
19
deadline, nunc pro tunc. The depositions shall be conducted as soon as practicable without requiring
20
any other change in the schedule of the case.
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 18, 2016
23
24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO DEPOSE PICKERING AND STRICKLAND
344675 v2
CASE NO. No. 2:13-CV-00804-KJM-EFB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?