Casarez v. W. Police Sacramento

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/1/2013 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED. Within 28 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall either (a) pay the applicable filing fee or (b) file an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis that adequately demonstrates that plaintiff is unable to pay the filing fee. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD CASAREZ, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:13-cv-0816 KJM KJN PS v. W. POLICE SACRAMENTO, 14 Defendant. ORDER / 15 16 On April 25, 2013, plaintiff Richard Casarez, proceeding without counsel, filed 17 this action and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.1 18 (Dkt. Nos. 1, 2.) Pursuant to federal statute, a filing fee of $350 is generally required to 19 commence a civil action in federal district court. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). However, the court may 20 authorize the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees or security therefor” by a 21 person that is unable to pay such fees or provide security therefor. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). 22 Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis does not demonstrate that he is 23 unable to pay the initial filing fee. The filing merely requests that plaintiff be permitted to 24 proceed in forma pauperis, but does not contain any information regarding plaintiff’s income, 25 1 26 This action proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 1 1 assets, and liabilities from which the court could determine whether or not plaintiff is able to pay 2 the filing fee.2 The request stated that a supporting affidavit was attached, but no such affidavit 3 appears in the court’s records. 4 Thus, plaintiff has made an inadequate showing of indigency. See Olivares v. 5 Marshall, 59 F.3d 109, 112 (9th Cir. 1995); Alexander v. Carson Adult High Sch., 9 F.3d 1448, 6 1449 (9th Cir. 1993). 7 For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (dkt. no. 2) is DENIED 9 WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 10 2. Within 28 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall either (a) pay the 11 applicable filing fee or (b) file an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis that 12 adequately demonstrates that plaintiff is unable to pay the filing fee. Plaintiff’s failure to either 13 pay the filing fee or file a sufficient amended application to proceed in forma pauperis by the 14 above deadline will result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed pursuant to Federal 15 Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 1, 2013 18 19 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 Plaintiff also appears to have used the wrong form, because the request references in forma pauperis status on appeal, whereas this action proceeds in federal district court. (Dkt. No. 2.) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?