Pinder v. Employment Development Department, et al

Filing 49

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/28/2015 GRANTING defendants' 48 Ex Parte Application. Defendants may file an Opening Brief to their Dispositive Motion not to exceed 25 pages, and may file a Reply Brief not to exceed 15 pages. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANK PINDER, 12 13 14 15 16 Case No. 2:13-cv-00817-TLN-AC Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER v. GRANTING LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY DEPARTMENT; RICHARD ROGERS; ADJUDICATION DAVID DERKS; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 On July 27, 2015, Defendants Employment Development Department (“EDD”), Richard Rogers (“Rogers”), and David Derks (“Derks,” collectively “Defendants”) filed an Ex Parte Application For An Order Granting Leave To Exceed Page Limit On Defendants’ Motion For 23 Summary Judgment Or, Alternatively, Summary Adjudication. 24 The Court, having read THE application and supporting papers, and for good cause 25 26 appearing, hereby GRANTS Defendants’ Ex Parte Application For An Order Granting Leave To Exceed Page Limit On Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment Or, Alternatively, Summary 27 Adjudication. 28 1 Order Granting Defendants’ Ex Parte Application For An Order Granting Leave To Exceed Page Limit On Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment Or, Alternatively, Summary Adjudication (2:13-cv-00817-TLN-AC) 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants may file an opening brief to their dispositive motion not to exceed 25 pages, and may file a reply brief not to exceed 15 pages. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: July 28, 2015 7 8 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Order Granting Defendants’ Ex Parte Application For An Order Granting Leave To Exceed Page Limit On Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment Or, Alternatively, Summary Adjudication (2:13-cv-00817-TLN-AC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?