Parthemore v. Kissel, et al
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/2/2015 DEEMING 51 Objections to Findings and Recommendations filed on 3/24/2015; CONFIRMING 50 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
IRA DON PARTHEMORE,
12
No. 2:13-cv-00819 KJM AC P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
B. KISSEL et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided
19
by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 6, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were
20
21
served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 49. Neither party timely
23
filed objections to the findings and recommendations. On March 31, 2015, the court adopted the
24
findings and recommendations in full. ECF No. 50. On the same day, objections from plaintiff
25
were received in the court; the objections were entered on the docket on April 1, 2015. ECF No.
26
50. The objections are deemed filed March 24, 2015. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).
27
Plaintiff’s objections were not considered by the court prior to entry of the March 31, 2015 order.
28
/////
1
1
Under the deadline set in the findings and recommendations, objections were due March
2
20, 2015. Plaintiff’s objections are therefore untimely. Moreover, the objections consist only of
3
a statement that plaintiff “disagrees with the Court’s granting of summary judgment for
4
Defendants Kissel, Thomas, Costa, Sherrard, Heinschel, Reaves, Toor, Malakkla, Virk, and Neal
5
and Defendant Soltanian on the grounds of his failure to grant a mednical [sic] hold for Plaintiff.
6
Plaintiff submits on the previous record . . . “ ECF No. 51. These summary objections do not
7
present any grounds which would require reconsideration of the court’s March 31, 2015 order
8
adopting in full the March 6, 2015 findings and recommendations.
9
Accordingly, good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the court’s March
10
31, 2015 order is confirmed.
11
DATED: April 2, 2015.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?