Hammersley et al v. General Electric Company, et al
Filing
139
CONSENT ORDER TO SUBSTITUTE PARTIES signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/15/15. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
AMY HAMMERSLEY, individually and as
surviving spouse of CARSON
HAMMERSLEY, as EXECUTOR OF THE
ESTATE OF CARSON HAMMERSLEY, and
as Parent and Natural Guardian of A.H., a
minor,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 2:13-cv-00826-TLN-AC
CONSENT ORDER TO
SUBSTITUTE PARTIES
vs.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GE
HEALTHCARE INC.; AND GE
HEALTHCARE AS,
Defendants.
On November 13, 2015, the parties jointly filed a Notice of Settlement in this case. [Doc.
No. 131]. On December 4, 2015, this Court entered an Order appointing Grace Lynn Leach as
Guardian Ad Litem for Plaintiff A.H., a minor, in this matter. [Doc. No. 137]. On December 7,
2015, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Substitute Parties and the parties have jointly submitted this
Consent Order to substitute Grace Lynn Leach in the place of Amy Hammersley as the
representative Plaintiff for A.H. WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that Grace Lynn Leach
is substituted as the party Plaintiff in this action as Guardian Ad Litem of A.H., a minor. Amy
Hammersley shall remain a Plaintiff in this action as it relates to the claims in her individual
capacity, as well as in her capacity as the Executor of the Estate of Carson Hammersley.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 15, 2015
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
Consented to By:
By:
/s/ David Krugler
David Krugler
Cash, Krugler & Fredericks, LLC
5447 Roswell Road, NE
Atlanta, GA 30342
404.659.1710
Attorney for Plaintiff
By: /s/ Matthew Evans
(with permission by filing attorney)
Matthew J. Evans
Paine Bickers, LLP
900 S. Gay Street, Suite 2200
Knoxville, TN 37902
865.525.0880
Attorney for Defendants
General Electric Company, GE Healthcare
Inc., and GE Healthcare AS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?