Hammersley et al v. General Electric Company, et al
Filing
81
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/30/14 ORDERING that the Scheduling Order 66 is amended as follows: all fact discovery shall be completed by 9/30/14; All expert disclosures shall be filed and served by 11/1/2014; all dispositive motions, shall be heard by 4/9/2015. All other deadlines established in the Scheduling Order, including the trial date, remain intact. (Kastilahn, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CARSON HAMMERSLEY, et al.,
Case No. 2:13-cv-00826-TLN-AC
Plaintiffs,
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
et al.,
ORDER GRANTING THE
PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR
AMENDMENT
TO SCHEDULING ORDER
Defendants.
The Parties have filed a Stipulation to Amend the Pretrial Scheduling Order.
The Court, having considered the grounds set forth in the parties’ Joint Motion
finds that the Motion is well taken, and is hereby GRANTED. The Court hereby
ORDERS that:
1.
The Scheduling Order (ECF 66) entered on January 29, 2014, is
amended to provide for the following changes:
a. All fact discovery, as described in Paragraph 4 of the Scheduling
Order, shall be completed by September 30, 2014.
b. All expert disclosures, as described in Paragraph 5 of the Scheduling
Order, shall be filed and served by November 1, 2014.
c. All dispositive motions, as described in Paragraph 6 of the Scheduling
Order, shall be heard by April 09, 2015.
2.
All other deadlines established in the Scheduling Order, including the
trial date, remain intact.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 30, 2014
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
APPROVED FOR ENTRY:
/s/ David N. Krugler
David N. Krugler
CASH, KRUGLER & FREDERICKS, LLC
5447 Roswell Road, N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30342
Attorney for Plaintiffs
/s/ Matthew J. Evans
Dwight E. Tarwater
Matthew J. Evans
PAINE, TARWATER, and BICKERS, LLP
900 S. Gay Street, Suite 2200
Knoxville, TN 37902
Attorneys for Defendants
General Electric Company, GE Healthcare Inc.,
and GE Healthcare AS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?