Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service
Filing
56
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/28/13 ORDERING that the defendant's 50 Motion to Alter the Judgment is submitted upon the record and the 11/4/13 hearing is VACATED. (Manzer, C)
1
2
ROBERT G. DREHER
Acting Assistant Attorney General
Environment & Natural Resources Division
United States Department of Justice
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
MARY HOLLINGSWORTH (AZ 027080)
Trial Attorney, Wildlife and Marine Resources Section
JOHN P. TUSTIN (TX 24056458)
Trial Attorney, Natural Resources Section
Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7611
Washington, D.C. 20044-7611
Tel: (202) 305-0324 (Hollingsworth)
(202) 305-3022 (Tustin)
Fax: (202) 305-0275 (Hollingsworth)
(202) 305-0506 (Tustin)
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
12
13
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
CONSERVATION CONGRESS, a non-profit
corporation;
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an
administrative agency of the United States
Department of Agriculture,
22
Federal Defendant.
23
)
)
)
)
)
) Case No. 2:13-CV-0832-LKK-DAD
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
24
25
26
STIPULATION REGARDING THE NOVEMBER 4 HEARING
ON FEDERAL DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT
27
28
Stipulation re: Nov. 4 hearing
1
2
The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, respectfully submit the following
stipulation regarding the November 4 hearing on Federal Defendant’s Motion to Alter Judgment.
3
Federal Defendant filed a motion to alter judgment on October 1 and noticed the hearing
4
for November 4. ECF No. 50-52. Plaintiff filed its response in opposition on October 20 (ECF
5
No. 53), and Federal Defendant filed its reply in support on October 25. ECF No. 54. The
6
motion to alter judgment is now fully briefed.
7
Pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 230(g), the parties stipulate that the motion may be
8
submitted upon the record and briefs on file and request that the November 4 hearing date be
9
vacated. A proposed order is attached hereto.
10
11
Respectfully submitted on this 28th day of October, 2013.
12
13
On behalf of Plaintiff:
/s/ (with permission)
ERIK B. RYBERG
ryberg@seanet.com
P.O. Box. 2013
Tucson, AZ 85702
Tel: (520) 784-8665
On behalf of Federal Defendant:
ROBERT G. DREHER
Acting Assistant Attorney General
Environment & Natural Resources Division
United States Department of Justice
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ John P. Tustin
MARY HOLLINGSWORTH (AZ 027080)
Trial Attorney, Wildlife and Marine Resources Section
JOHN P. TUSTIN (TX 24056458)
Trial Attorney, Natural Resources Section
Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7611
Washington, D.C. 20044-7611
Tel: (202) 305-0324 (Hollingsworth)
(202) 305-3022 (Tustin)
Fax: (202) 305-0275 (Hollingsworth)
(202) 305-0506 (Tustin)
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
4
5
6
7
CONSERVATION CONGRESS, a non-profit
corporation;
Plaintiff,
v.
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an
administrative agency of the United States
Department of Agriculture,
Federal Defendant.
12
13
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:13-CV-0832-LKK-DAD
ORDER REGARDING THE
NOVEMBER 4 HEARING ON
FEDERAL DEFENDANT’S MOTION
TO ALTER JUDGMENT
The Court is in receipt of the parties’ Stipulation Regarding the November 4 Hearing on
Federal Defendant’s Motion to Alter Judgment.
15
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Federal Defendant’s Motion to Alter Judgment is
16
submitted upon the record and briefs on file. It is further ordered that the November 4 hearing is
17
VACATED.
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: October 28, 2013
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
3
4
I, John P. Tustin, hereby certify that on October 28, 2013, I caused the foregoing to be
served upon counsel of record through the Court’s CM/ECF system.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ John P. Tustin
JOHN P. TUSTIN
Attorney for Federal Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?