Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service

Filing 56

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/28/13 ORDERING that the defendant's 50 Motion to Alter the Judgment is submitted upon the record and the 11/4/13 hearing is VACATED. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 ROBERT G. DREHER Acting Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 MARY HOLLINGSWORTH (AZ 027080) Trial Attorney, Wildlife and Marine Resources Section JOHN P. TUSTIN (TX 24056458) Trial Attorney, Natural Resources Section Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 Tel: (202) 305-0324 (Hollingsworth) (202) 305-3022 (Tustin) Fax: (202) 305-0275 (Hollingsworth) (202) 305-0506 (Tustin) BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 12 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 CONSERVATION CONGRESS, a non-profit corporation; 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an administrative agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, 22 Federal Defendant. 23 ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:13-CV-0832-LKK-DAD ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 24 25 26 STIPULATION REGARDING THE NOVEMBER 4 HEARING ON FEDERAL DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT 27 28 Stipulation re: Nov. 4 hearing 1 2 The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, respectfully submit the following stipulation regarding the November 4 hearing on Federal Defendant’s Motion to Alter Judgment. 3 Federal Defendant filed a motion to alter judgment on October 1 and noticed the hearing 4 for November 4. ECF No. 50-52. Plaintiff filed its response in opposition on October 20 (ECF 5 No. 53), and Federal Defendant filed its reply in support on October 25. ECF No. 54. The 6 motion to alter judgment is now fully briefed. 7 Pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 230(g), the parties stipulate that the motion may be 8 submitted upon the record and briefs on file and request that the November 4 hearing date be 9 vacated. A proposed order is attached hereto. 10 11 Respectfully submitted on this 28th day of October, 2013. 12 13 On behalf of Plaintiff: /s/ (with permission) ERIK B. RYBERG ryberg@seanet.com P.O. Box. 2013 Tucson, AZ 85702 Tel: (520) 784-8665 On behalf of Federal Defendant: ROBERT G. DREHER Acting Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ John P. Tustin MARY HOLLINGSWORTH (AZ 027080) Trial Attorney, Wildlife and Marine Resources Section JOHN P. TUSTIN (TX 24056458) Trial Attorney, Natural Resources Section Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 Tel: (202) 305-0324 (Hollingsworth) (202) 305-3022 (Tustin) Fax: (202) 305-0275 (Hollingsworth) (202) 305-0506 (Tustin) BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 3 4 5 6 7 CONSERVATION CONGRESS, a non-profit corporation; Plaintiff, v. 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an administrative agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, Federal Defendant. 12 13 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:13-CV-0832-LKK-DAD ORDER REGARDING THE NOVEMBER 4 HEARING ON FEDERAL DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT The Court is in receipt of the parties’ Stipulation Regarding the November 4 Hearing on Federal Defendant’s Motion to Alter Judgment. 15 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Federal Defendant’s Motion to Alter Judgment is 16 submitted upon the record and briefs on file. It is further ordered that the November 4 hearing is 17 VACATED. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 28, 2013 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 3 4 I, John P. Tustin, hereby certify that on October 28, 2013, I caused the foregoing to be served upon counsel of record through the Court’s CM/ECF system. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ John P. Tustin JOHN P. TUSTIN Attorney for Federal Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?