Hickman v. County of Butte et al

Filing 8

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/18/2013 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CLARENCE B. HICKMAN, SR.,

12

Petitioner,

13
14

No. 2:13-cv-0837 TLN CKD P

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

COUNTY OF BUTTE, et al.,

15

Respondents.

16
By order filed May 31, 2013, petitioner’s habeas application was dismissed and thirty

17
18

days’ leave to file an amended application was granted. The thirty day period has now expired,

19

and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

20
21

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

22

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

23

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

24

after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

25

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

26

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

2

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: July 18, 2013

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

1
hick0837.fta

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2