Estate of Anton Pat Barrett, et al. v. City of Vallejo, et al.

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/28/2015 GRANTING 17 Motion for Order Shortening Time; SETTING the Motion Hearing on 16 Motion to Compel for 2/4/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Del aney; ORDERING that any opposition be filed by 2/2/2015 at 12:00 PM; CAUTIONING non-party witness Stacey Madkins that a failure to file an opposition and appear at said hearing may result in an order of contempt and/or sanctions issued against her; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to serve a copy of this order on Stacey Madkins, 915 Waterford Avenue, Stockton, CA 95206. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ESTATE OF ANTON BARRETT, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-0846 JAM CKD v. ORDER CITY OF VALLEJO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Defendants have filed a motion for order shortening time for hearing on a motion to 18 compel attendance of a subpoenaed non-party witness Stacey Madkins at deposition. Good cause 19 appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 20 1. Defendant’s motion for order shortening time (ECF No. 17) is granted. 21 2. Hearing on defendants’ motion to compel is set for hearing on February 4, 2015 at 22 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 24. Opposition, if any, shall be filed no later than February 2, 2015 23 at 12:00 p.m. Non-party witness Stacey Madkins is cautioned that failure to file opposition and 24 appear at the hearing may result in an order of contempt and/or sanctions issued against her. 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Stacey Madkins, 915 2 Waterford Ave., Stockton, CA 95206. 3 Dated: January 28, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 4 barrett.ost 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?