Collier v. Vallejo Police Department et al

Filing 44

ORDER ADOPTING 42 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/24/2014. Plaintiff's 10/7/2013 38 Motion to Set Aside Jurisdiction is DENIED. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DONALD T. COLLIER,

12
13
14

No. 2:13-cv-0852 LKK AC PS

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

VALLEJO POLICE DEP’T, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a
United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).
On February 11, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

20

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

21

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed

22

objections to the findings and recommendations.

23

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

25

ORDERED that:

26

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 11, 2014, are adopted in full;

27

2. Plaintiff’s October 7, 2013 motion to set aside jurisdiction (ECF No. 38) is denied .

28
1

1

DATED: March 24, 2014.

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2