Collier v. Vallejo Police Department et al

Filing 47

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/10/2014 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DONALD T. COLLIER,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:13-cv-0852 LKK AC PS

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

VALLEJO POLICE DEP’T, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed on February 11, 2014 and thirty days leave to file an

18

amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has

19

not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

20
21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

22

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

23

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

24

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

25

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

26

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

27

shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are

28
1

1

advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the

2

District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

DATED: June 10, 2014

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2