Smith v. Duffy, et al

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/12/13 DENYING 25 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

DARRELL ANTHONY SMITH,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. 2:13-cv-0864 AC P

v.

ORDER

DUFFY, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
16

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has

17

ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983

18

cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional

19

circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

20

1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900

21

F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required

22

exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be

23

denied.

24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for the appointment of

25

counsel (ECF No. 25) is denied.

26

DATED: December 12, 2013

27
28