Verma, et al. v. Okev, et al.

Filing 43

PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 3/17/14 ORDERING that all Discovery shall be completed by 8/22/2014; Designation of Expert Witnesses is due by 10/22/2014; the last day to hear dispositive motions shal l be 2/19/2015; the Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 4/30/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., with a joint final pretrial conference statement due by 4/9/2015; the parties shall file trial briefs no t later than 4/16/2015; any evidentiary or procedural motions are due by 4/9/2015, oppositions due by 4/16/2015, and any reply due by 4/23/2015; A Jury Trial is SET for 6/22/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. Engla nd, Jr.. The parties estimate a trial length of five (5) days. A Settlement Conference is SET for 6/9/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. Each party is directed to submit to the chambers of Judge Allison Claire confidential settlement conference statements not later than 6/2/2014. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 KRISTI VERMA, VISHAL VERMA AND ZENTEK CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 15 No. 2:13-cv-00865-MCE-EFB PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER EFRAT OKEV, LLOYD BURTON AND AUGZENTA, INC., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the Court makes the following 18 19 Pretrial Scheduling Order. 20 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS All named Defendants have been served and no further service is permitted 21 22 without leave of court, good cause having been shown. 23 II. ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS No joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without leave of 24 25 court, good cause having been shown. 26 III. 27 28 JURISDICTION/VENUE Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Jurisdiction and venue are not contested. 1 1 IV. DISCOVERY 2 All discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall be completed by 3 August 22, 2014. In this context, “completed” means that all discovery shall have been 4 conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery 5 shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has 6 been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery must be 7 noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance with the local rules of this 8 Court. 9 V. 10 DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the Court, and serve upon all other 11 parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to 12 tender at trial not later than October 22, 2014.1 The designation shall be accompanied 13 by a written report prepared and signed by the witness. The report shall comply with 14 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B). 15 Within twenty (20) days after the designation of expert witnesses, any party may 16 designate a supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a 17 subject covered by an expert designated by an adverse party. The right to designate a 18 supplemental expert for rebuttal purposes only shall apply to a party who has not 19 previously disclosed an expert witness on the date set for expert witness disclosure by 20 this Pretrial Scheduling Order. 21 Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all 22 likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An 23 expert witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the 24 party offering the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not 25 have been reasonably anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the Court 26 27 28 1 The discovery of experts will include whether any motions based on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and/or Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999) are anticipated. 2 1 and opposing counsel were promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that 2 the witness was promptly made available for deposition. 3 For purposes of this Pretrial Scheduling Order, an “expert” is any person who may 4 be used at trial to present evidence under Rules 702, 703, and 705 of the Federal Rules 5 of Evidence, which include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their 6 expertise, have rendered expert opinions in the normal course of their work duties or 7 observations pertinent to the issues in the case) and “retained experts” (persons 8 specifically designated by a party to be a testifying expert for the purposes of litigation). 9 Each party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient, retained, or 10 both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the 11 express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts 12 must state in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such 13 persons. 14 All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render 15 an informed opinion, and give their bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to 16 give full and complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts 17 will not be permitted to testify at the trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or 18 opinion formed, after deposition taken subsequent to designation. 19 Counsel are instructed to complete all discovery of expert witnesses in a timely 20 manner in order to comply with the Court’s deadline for filing dispositive motions. 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 3 1 2 VI. MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE The last day to hear dispositive motions shall be February 19, 2015. All papers 3 should be filed in conformity with the Local Rules. However, with respect to Motions for 4 Summary Judgment only, the parties shall comply with the following filing deadlines: 5 6 7 8 9 10 Motion for Summary Judgment filed at least 8 weeks prior to hearing Opposition and any cross-motion filed at least 5 weeks prior to hearing Reply and opposition to cross-motion filed at least 3 weeks prior to hearing Reply to cross-motion filed at least 1 week prior to hearing 11 12 Absent leave of the Court, all issues the parties wish to resolve on summary 13 judgment must be raised together in one (1) motion or cross-motion. Should the parties 14 wish to file additional motions for summary judgment, they must seek leave of the Court. 15 The parties are directed to the Court’s website for available hearing dates. 16 (www.caed.uscourts.gov → choose Judges → choose Judge England → choose 17 Standard Information) 18 All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Failure to 19 comply with Local Rules 230 and 260, as modified by this Order, may be deemed 20 consent to the motion and the Court may dispose of the motion summarily. Further, 21 failure to timely oppose a summary judgment motion2 may result in the granting of that 22 motion if the movant shifts the burden to the nonmovant to demonstrate that a genuine 23 issue of material fact remains for trial. 24 The Court places a page limit for points and authorities (exclusive of exhibits and 25 other supporting documentation) of twenty (20) pages on all initial moving papers, twenty 26 (20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit 27 28 2 The Court urges any party that contemplates bringing a motion for summary judgment or who must oppose a motion for summary judgment to review Local Rule 260. 4 1 increases must be made in writing to the Court setting forth any and all reasons for any 2 increase in page limit at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the motion. 3 4 For the Court’s convenience, citations to the Supreme Court Lexis database should include parallel citations to the Westlaw database. 5 The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device 6 designed to address the admissibility of evidence. The Court will look with disfavor upon 7 dispositional motions presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the guise of 8 motions in limine. 9 The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could 10 have been tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion 11 cut-off date may constitute waiver of such issue. 12 VII. 13 FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE The Final Pretrial Conference is set for April 30, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. At least one 14 of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties shall attend the Final 15 Pretrial Conference. If by reason of illness or other unavoidable circumstance a trial 16 attorney is unable to attend, the attorney who attends in place of the trial attorney shall 17 have equal familiarity with the case and equal authorization to make commitments on 18 behalf of the client. 19 Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Final 20 Pretrial Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of 21 witnesses for oral testimony. 22 The parties shall file, not later than April 9, 2015, a Joint Final Pretrial Conference 23 Statement. The provisions of Local Rules 281 shall apply with respect to the matters to 24 be included in the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement. In addition to those 25 subjects listed in Local Rule 281(b), the parties are to provide the Court with a plain, 26 concise statement that identifies every non-discovery motion tendered to the Court and 27 its resolution. Failure to comply with Local Rule 281, as modified by this Pretrial 28 Scheduling Order, may be grounds for sanctions. 5 1 At the time of filing the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement, counsel shall 2 also electronically mail to the Court in digital format compatible with Microsoft Word, the 3 Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement in its entirety including the witness and exhibit 4 lists. These documents shall be sent to: mceorders@caed.uscourts.gov. 5 The parties should identify first the core undisputed facts relevant to all claims. 6 The parties should then, in a concise manner, identify those undisputed core facts that 7 are relevant to each claim. The disputed facts should be identified in the same manner. 8 Where the parties are unable to agree as to what disputed facts are properly before the 9 Court for trial, they should nevertheless list all disputed facts asserted by each party. 10 11 12 13 Each disputed fact or undisputed fact should be separately numbered or lettered. Each party shall identify and concisely list each disputed evidentiary issue which will be the subject of a motion in limine. Each party shall identify the points of law which concisely describe the legal 14 issues of the trial which will be discussed in the parties’ respective trial briefs. Points of 15 law should reflect issues derived from the core undisputed and disputed facts. Parties 16 shall not include argument or authorities with any point of law. 17 The parties shall prepare a joint statement of the case in plain concise language 18 which will be read to the jury at the beginning of the trial. The purpose of the joint 19 statement is to inform the jury what the case is about. 20 The parties are reminded that pursuant to Local Rule 281 they are required to list 21 in the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement all witnesses and exhibits they propose 22 to offer at trial. After the name of each witness, each party shall provide a brief 23 statement of the nature of the testimony to be proffered. The parties may file a joint list 24 or each party may file separate lists. These list(s) shall not be contained in the body of 25 the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement itself, but shall be attached as separate 26 documents to be used as addenda to the Final Pretrial Order. 27 Plaintiffs' exhibits shall be listed numerically. Defendants' exhibits shall be listed 28 alphabetically. The parties shall use the standard exhibit stickers provided by the Court 6 1 Clerk’s Office: pink for plaintiff and blue for defendant. In the event that the alphabet is 2 exhausted, the exhibits shall be marked “AA-ZZ” and “AAA-ZZZ” etc. After three letters, 3 note the number of letters in parenthesis (i.e., “AAAA(4)”) to reduce confusion at trial. All 4 multi-page exhibits shall be stapled or otherwise fastened together and each page within 5 the exhibit shall be numbered. All photographs shall be marked individually. The list of 6 exhibits shall not include excerpts of depositions, which may be used to impeach 7 witnesses. In the event that Plaintiffs and Defendants offer the same exhibit during trial, 8 that exhibit shall be referred to by the designation the exhibit is first identified. The Court 9 cautions the parties to pay attention to this detail so that all concerned will not be 10 11 confused by one exhibit being identified with both a number and a letter. The Final Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the offering at trial of 12 witnesses and exhibits not listed in the Final Pretrial Order, and the parties are cautioned 13 that the standard will be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or 14 witnesses that a party does not intend to offer will be viewed as an abuse of the Court’s 15 processes. 16 The parties also are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of 17 Civil Procedure it will be their duty at the Final Pretrial Conference to aid the Court in: 18 (a) the formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination of frivolous claims or 19 defenses; (b) the settling of facts that should properly be admitted; and (c) the avoidance 20 of unnecessary proof and cumulative evidence. Counsel must cooperatively prepare the 21 Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement and participate in good faith at the Final 22 Pretrial Conference with these aims in mind. A failure to do so may result in the 23 imposition of sanctions which may include monetary sanctions, orders precluding proof, 24 elimination of claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as the Court deems 25 appropriate. 26 VIII. TRIAL BRIEFS 27 28 The parties shall file trial briefs not later than April 16, 2015. Counsel are directed to Local Rule 285 regarding the content of trial briefs. 7 1 IX. EVIDENTIARY AND/OR PROCEDURAL MOTIONS 2 Any evidentiary or procedural motions are to be filed by April 9, 2015. 3 Oppositions must be filed by April 16, 2015, and any reply must be filed by April 23, 4 2015. The motions will be heard by the Court at the same time as the Final Pretrial 5 Conference. 6 X. TRIAL SETTING 7 The trial is set for June 22, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. Trial will be a jury trial. The panel 8 will consist of seven (7) jurors. The parties estimate a trial length of five (5) days. 9 XI. 10 11 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE A Settlement Conference is set before Judge Allison Claire on June 9, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. 12 Each party is directed to have a principal capable of disposition at the Settlement 13 Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms at the Settlement 14 Conference. 15 Each party is directed to submit to the chambers of Judge Allison Claire 16 confidential settlement conference statements not later than June 2, 2014. Such 17 statements are neither to be filed with the clerk nor served on opposing counsel. 18 However, each party shall notify the other party that the statement has been submitted 19 to the judge’s chambers. 20 XII. 21 VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM Pursuant to Local Rule 271 parties will need to lodge a stipulation and proposed 22 order requesting referral to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program. 23 XIII. MODIFICATION OF PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 24 The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 25 Procedure, the Pretrial Scheduling Order shall not be modified except by leave of court 26 upon a showing of good cause. Agreement by the parties pursuant to stipulation alone 27 to modify the Pretrial Scheduling Order does not constitute good cause. Except in 28 /// 8 1 extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or counsel will not constitute 2 good cause. 3 XIV. 4 5 6 7 OBJECTIONS TO PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER This Pretrial Scheduling Order will become final without further order of the Court unless objections are filed within seven (7) court days of service of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 17, 2014 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?