Verma, et al. v. Okev, et al.

Filing 76

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 2/17/15 ORDERING that the date for the Parties to make their expert disclosures in accordance with Rule 26(a)(2) is EXTENDED to 5/13/15. All expert discovery shall be COMPLETED by 6/30/15. All other pretrial and trial deadlines shall remain unchanged. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
12 233 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 220 Santa Monica, California 90401 Pfeiffer FitzGibbon & Ziontz, LLP Thomas  N.  FitzGibbon  (SBN:  169194)   1 tom@pfzlaw.com   2 PFEIFFER  FITZGIBBON  &  ZIONTZ  LLP   233  Wilshire  Boulevard,  Ste.  220   3 Santa  Monica,  CA  90401   Telephone:  (310)  451-­‐5800   4 Facsimile:  (310)  496-­‐3175     5 Douglas  S.  Teasdale  (Admitted  Pro  Hac  Vice)   6 dteasdale@teasdalelaw.com   TEASDALE  &  ASSOCIATES   7 5017  Washington  Place,  Suite  302   St.  Louis,  MO  63108   8 Telephone:  (314)  725-­‐5353   9 Facsimile:  (314)  454-­‐0065     10 Attorneys  for  Defendants   Lloyd  Burton;  Efrat  Okev   11   13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT   EASTERN  DISTRICT  OF  CALIFORNIA     KRISTI  VERMA,  et  al.   Case  No.  2:13-­‐CV-­‐000865-­‐MCE  (EFB)     [Assigned  to  the  Hon.  Morrison  C.  England,         Plaintiffs,   Jr.  for  All  Purposes]           v.   ORDER  MODIFYING  SCHEDULING     ORDERS  AND  EXTENDING  EXPERT   EFRAT  OKEV,  et  al.   DISCLOSURE  AND  EXPERT  DISCOVERY     DEADLINES           Defendants.     Complaint  Filed:   May  2,  2013   Trial  Date:       December  5,  2016     AND  RELATED  COUNTERCLAIMS   22   23 This  Order  modifying  the  Court’s  Scheduling  Orders  (Docket  Nos.  43,  54  &  72)  and  [1]   24 extending  the  date  for  disclosure  of  expert  witnesses  under  Rule  26(a)(2)  of  the  Federal   25 Rules  of  Civil  Procedure  and  [2]  extending  the  deadline  for  the  completion  of  expert   26 discovery  (the  “Order”),  is  made  pursuant  to  Federal  Rule  of  Civil  Procedure  16(b)(4)  and   27 Rule  26  and  is  based  on  the  Stipulation  dated  February  10,  2015  between  Plaintiffs  Kristi   28 Verma  (“Kristi”),  Vishal  Verma  (“Vishal”),  and  Zentek  Corporation  (“Zentek”)(collectively   Case  No.  2:13-­‐CV-­‐000865-­‐MCE  (EFB)     ORDER  TO  EXTEND  EXPERT  DISCOVERY   1 “Plaintiffs”),  on  the  one  hand,  and  Defendants  Efrat  Okev  (“Efrat”),  Lloyd  Burton  (“Lloyd”),   2 and  Augzenta  Inc.  (“Augzenta”)(collectively  “Defendants)  on  the  other  hand  (Plaintiffs  and   3 Defendants  collectively  referred  to  as  the  “Parties”)  with  respect  to  the  following  recitals  of   4 fact:   Recitals   5 A.   6 The  deadline  for  disclosure  of  expert  witnesses  and  their  initial  reports  is   7 February  13,  2015  and  the  deadline  for  the  completion  of  expert  witness  discovery  is  March   8 27,  2015.   B.   9 The  Parties  have  submitted  a  Stipulation  that  proposes  new  dates  for  expert   11 continuance  of  the  deadlines  would  further  the  possibility  of  settlement  and  will  not  result  in   233 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 220 Santa Monica, California 90401 Pfeiffer FitzGibbon & Ziontz, LLP 10 disclosure  and  discovery  and  confirms  the  Parties  are  in  settlement  negotiations  and  that   12 the  continuance  of  any  other  deadlines  if  negotiations  are  not  successful.   In  light  of  the  information  provided  in  the  Stipulation,  the  court  finds  good  cause  for   13 14 continuing  the  deadlines  as  requested,  and  accordingly:   15 IT  IS  ORDERED  THAT:   16 1.   The  date  for  the  Parties  to  make  their  expert  disclosures  in  accordance  with   17 Rule  26(a)(2)  is  extended  to  May  13,  2015.   18 2.   All  expert  discovery  shall  be  completed  by  June  30,  2015.   19 3.   All  other  pretrial  and  trial  deadlines  shall  remain  unchanged.   20 IT  IS  SO  ORDERED.     21 Dated:    February  17,  2015   22 23   24 25 26 27 28 Case  No.  2:13-­‐CV-­‐000865-­‐MCE  (EFB)   -­‐2-­‐   ORDER  TO  EXTEND  EXPERT  DISCOVERY    

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?