Verma, et al. v. Okev, et al.

Filing 90

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 11/22/16 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KRISTI VERMA, et al.

12
13
14
15

No. 13-cv-00865-MCE-DB

Plaintiffs,
v.

ORDER

EFRAT OKEV, et al.
Defendants.

16
17

On September 26, 2016, the Court, in review of the case docket, ordered Plaintiff

18

Zentek Corporation to obtain counsel and to file a status report regarding the status of its

19

current representation no later than October 11, 2016. ECF No. 87. On September 30,

20

2016, Defendants Efrat Okev, Lloyd Burton, and Augzenta, Inc. filed a Motion to

21

(1) Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint For Failure to Comply With Court Orders or (2) to

22

Preclude Plaintiffs From Offering Evidence. ECF No. 88. Plaintiff Zentek Corporation

23

has failed to respond to the Court’s September 26 Order, and all Plaintiffs have failed to

24

file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, as

25

required under Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(c). The Court on

26

October 13, 2016 thus issued an order that all Plaintiffs show cause in writing by October

27

24, 2016 as to why the case should not be dismissed with prejudice, to which Plaintiffs

28

have failed to respond. ECF No. 89.
1

1
2

The Court thus Orders that Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint be DISMISSED
with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

Dated: November 22, 2016

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2