Braun v. Cellco Partnership, et al.

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER 11 for Dismissal signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/13/2013. Defendant Airtouch Cellular is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice, from action. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Aa
aron L. Agen
nbroad (Stat Bar No. 24
te
42613)
ala
agenbroad@
@JonesDay.com
Al
llison E. Cro (State Ba No. 27907
ow
ar
78)
ac
[e-mail]
JO
ONES DAY
55 California Street, 26th Floor
55
a
h
Sa Francisco, CA 94104
an
4
Te
elephone: +1.415.626
6.3939
Fa
acsimile:
+1.415.875
5.5700
At
ttorneys for Defendant
CE
ELLCO PAR
RTNERSHIP D/B/A VE
P
ERIZON
WIRELESS
W

8
UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIF
N
T
FORNIA
10
11
12

NA
ATHAN BR
RAUN,

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Plaintif
ff,
v.

Case No. 2
0872-WBS-E
EFB
2:13-CV-00
ORDER G
GRANTING DISMISS
G
SAL OF
DEFEND
DANT AIRT
TOUCH
CELLUL
LAR WITH PREJUDIC
CE

CE
ELLCO PA
ARTNERSH a Delaw
HIP,
ware
Pa
artnership doing business in the St
d
tate of
Ca
alifornia as VERIZON WIRELES
N
SS;
AI
IRTOUCH CELLULA a California
AR,
Co
orporation doing busin in the State of
ness
S
Ca
alifornia as VERIZON WIRELES and
N
SS;
DO 1 throu 25, incl
OES
ugh
lusive,
Defend
dants.

20
21

Pursua to the stip
ant
pulation of th plaintiff, Nathan Brau and the d
he
un,
defendant, C
Cellco

22

artnership, de
efendant Air
rtouch Cellu is hereby DISMISSE from this action, with prejudice.
ular
y
ED
s
h
Pa

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERE
S
ED.
Da
ated: Septem
mber 13, 201
13

25
26
27
28
[PROPOSE ORDER G
ED]
GRANTING D
DISMISSAL OF
F
DEFE
ENDANT AIR
RTOUCH CELLULAR WITH
H
PREJUDICE
E