Joseph v. Heatley, et al
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/21/15 ORDERING that Plaintiffs request 10 is denied; Plaintiffs additional exhibits submitted on March 11, 2015, are disregarded; and Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALONZO JAMES JOSEPH,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-CV-0879-CMK-P
vs.
ORDER
S. HEATLEY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
/
17
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff request (Doc. 10) that the court consider
19
additional exhibits as part of his original complaint. Because the complaint must be complete in
20
itself, see Local Rule 220, plaintiff’s request must be denied and plaintiff’s newly-submitted
21
exhibits will be disregarded. Plaintiff may, however, file an amended complaint containing all
22
allegations and exhibits in a single pleading, within 30 days of the date of this order. If plaintiff
23
elects not to do so within the time provided, the action will proceed on the original complaint
24
with only those exhibits attached thereto.
25
///
26
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
Plaintiff’s request (Doc. 10) is denied;
3
2.
Plaintiff’s additional exhibits submitted on March 11, 2015, are
4
disregarded; and
5
3.
6
Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this
order.
7
8
9
10
DATED: May 21, 2015
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?