Kalani v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. et al

Filing 16

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/23/13: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 4/11/2014. Discovery due by 10/31/2013. Dispositive Motions filed by 8/22/2014. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/30/ 2014 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Jury Trial set for 1/5/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Settlement Conference set for 11/12/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT KALANI, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:13-cv-00901-KJM-KJN v. STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA, INC., dba HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS #11; KOHANBASH CENTURY PLAZA, LLC, 16 ORDER Defendants. 17 An initial scheduling conference was held in this case on September 19, 2013. 18 19 Tanya Moore appeared for plaintiff; Matthew Kenefick appeared for defendant Harbor Freight 20 Tools USA, Inc., and Michael Welch appeared for defendant Kohanbash Century Plaza, LLC. 21 Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on September 12, 2013, and discussed a 22 schedule for the case with counsel at the hearing, the court makes the following orders: 23 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without 24 25 leave of court, good cause having been shown. 26 II. 27 28 ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS Plaintiff reserves the right to join additional parties and amend the complaint based on the initial site inspection. No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is 1 1 permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); 2 Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992). 3 III. 4 JURISDICTION/VENUE Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343, and 1367. Venue is 5 predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)-(c). Jurisdiction and venue are not disputed. 6 IV. 7 DISCOVERY Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) shall be 8 completed by October 31, 2013. All discovery shall be completed by March 28, 2014. In this 9 context, “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions 10 have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate 11 order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All 12 motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance 13 with the local rules of this court. While the assigned magistrate judge reviews proposed 14 discovery phase protective orders, requests to seal or redact are decided by Judge Mueller as 15 discussed in more detail below. 16 V. 17 DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the court, and serve upon all other 18 parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial 19 not later than April 11, 2014. The designation shall be accompanied by a written report prepared 20 and signed by the witness. The report shall comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 26(a)(2)(B). By April 22, 2014, any party who previously disclosed expert witnesses may submit 22 a supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an 23 expert designated by an adverse party, if the party supplementing an expert witness designation 24 has not previously retained an expert to testify on that subject. The supplemental designation 25 shall be accompanied by a written report, which shall also comply with the conditions stated 26 above. 27 Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all 28 likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert 2 1 witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering 2 the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably 3 anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the court and opposing counsel were 4 promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made 5 available for deposition. 6 For purposes of this scheduling order, an “expert” is any person who may be used 7 at trial to present evidence under Rules 702, 703 and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which 8 include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert 9 opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the 10 case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a testifying expert 11 for the purposes of litigation). A party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient, 12 retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the 13 express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts must state 14 in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such persons. 15 All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render 16 an informed opinion, and give the bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full and 17 complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts will not be permitted 18 to testify at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after deposition 19 taken subsequent to designation. All expert discovery shall be completed by May 22, 2014. 20 VI. 21 MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining 22 orders, or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than August 22, 2014. The 23 parties may obtain available hearing dates by calling Casey Schultz, the Courtroom Deputy, at 24 (916) 930-4193. 25 26 All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule 230 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions; the following provisions also apply: 27 28 (a) The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and ///// 3 1 (b) When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the 2 opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding the legal holiday. 3 Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to 4 the motion, and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651, 5 652-53 (9th Cir. 1994). 6 The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty 7 (20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases 8 must be made through the courtroom deputy clerk at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of 9 the motion. 10 Prior to filing a motion in a case in which the parties are represented by counsel, 11 counsel shall engage in a pre-filing meet and confer to discuss thoroughly the substance of the 12 contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Plaintiff’s counsel should carefully evaluate 13 the defendants’ contentions as to deficiencies in the complaint, and in many instances, the party 14 considering a motion should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable defect. Counsel 15 should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion of any kind is filed, including for 16 summary judgment, the briefing is directed only to those substantive issues requiring resolution 17 by the court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other non-substantive matters during 18 the meet and confer. A notice of motion shall contain a certification by counsel filing the 19 motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a brief summary of meet and 20 confer efforts. 21 The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device 22 designed to address the admissibility of evidence. The court looks with disfavor upon 23 dispositional motions presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the guise of motions 24 in limine. Although all motions in limine must be filed in conjunction with the joint pretrial 25 statement, the court will hear only those motions it has identified to counsel before the hearing 26 date. 27 ///// 28 ///// 4 1 The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could 2 have been tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off 3 date may constitute waiver of such issue. 4 VII. 5 SEALING No document will be sealed, nor shall a redacted document be filed, without the 6 prior approval of the court. If a document for which sealing or redaction is sought relates to the 7 record on a motion to be decided by Judge Mueller, the request to seal or redact should be 8 directed to her and not the assigned magistrate judge. All requests to seal or redact shall be 9 governed by Local Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction); protective orders covering the 10 discovery phase of litigation shall not govern the filing of sealed or redacted documents on the 11 public docket. The court will only consider requests to seal or redact filed by the proponent of 12 sealing or redaction. If a party plans to make a filing that includes material an opposing party has 13 identified as confidential and potentially subject to sealing, the filing party shall provide the 14 opposing party with sufficient notice in advance of filing to allow for the seeking of an order of 15 sealing or redaction from the court. 16 VIII. 17 FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE The Final Pretrial Conference is set for October 30, 2014, at 3:30 p.m. At least 18 one of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties shall attend the Final Pretrial 19 Conference. If by reason of illness or other unavoidable circumstance a trial attorney is unable to 20 attend, the attorney who attends in place of the trial attorney shall have equal familiarity with the 21 case and equal authorization to make commitments on behalf of the client. 22 Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Final 23 Pretrial Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of 24 witnesses for oral testimony. The parties shall confer and file a joint pretrial conference 25 statement by October 9, 2014. The provisions of Local Rule 281 shall apply with respect to the 26 matters to be included in the joint pretrial statement. In addition to those subjects listed in Local 27 Rule 281(b), the parties are to provide the court with the following: 28 ///// 5 1 2 3 - A plain, concise statement that identifies every non-discovery motion previously tendered to the court and its resolution. - A concise, joint list of undisputed core facts that are relevant to each claim. 4 Disputed core facts should then be identified in the same manner. The parties are reminded not to 5 identify every fact in dispute but only those disputed facts that are essential to the formulation of 6 each claim. Each disputed fact and undisputed fact should be separately numbered or lettered. 7 Where the parties are unable to agree on the core disputed facts, they should nevertheless list core 8 disputed facts in the above manner. 9 10 - Concise lists of disputed evidentiary issues that will be the subject of a party’s motion in limine. 11 - Each party’s points of law, which concisely describe the legal issues of the trial 12 which will be discussed in the parties’ respective trial briefs. Points of law should reflect issues 13 derived from the core undisputed and disputed facts. Parties shall not include argument or 14 authorities with any point of law. 15 - A joint statement of the case in plain concise language, which will be read to the 16 jury during voir dire and at the beginning of the trial. The purpose of the joint statement is to 17 inform the jury what the case is about. 18 19 20 Discovery documents to be listed in the pretrial statement shall not include documents to be used only for impeachment and in rebuttal. The parties are reminded that pursuant to Local Rule 281 they are required to 21 attach to the Final Pretrial Conference Statement an exhibit listing witnesses and exhibits they 22 propose to offer at trial. After the name of each witness, each party shall provide a brief 23 statement of the nature of the testimony to be proffered. The parties may file a joint list or each 24 party may file separate lists. These list(s) shall not be contained in the body of the Final Pretrial 25 Conference Statement itself, but shall be attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to 26 the Final Pretrial Order. 27 28 Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed numerically. Defendants’ exhibits shall be listed alphabetically. The parties shall use the standard exhibit stickers provided by the court: pink for 6 1 plaintiff and blue for defendants. In the event that the alphabet is exhausted, the exhibits shall be 2 marked “AA-ZZ.” However, if the amount of defendants’ exhibits exceeds “ZZ” exhibits shall 3 be then listed as A-3, A-4, A-5, etc. All multi-page exhibits shall be stapled or otherwise fastened 4 together and each page within the exhibit shall be numbered. The list of exhibits shall not include 5 excerpts of depositions, which may be used to impeach witnesses. In the event that plaintiff and 6 defendants offer the same exhibit during trial, that exhibit shall be referred to by the designation 7 the exhibit is first identified. The court cautions the parties to pay attention to this detail so that 8 all concerned, including the jury, will not be confused by one exhibit being identified with both a 9 number and a letter. The parties are encouraged to consult concerning exhibits and, to the extent 10 possible, provide joint exhibits, which shall be designated as JX and listed numerically, e.g., JX- 11 1, JX-2. 12 The Final Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the offering at trial of 13 witnesses and exhibits not listed in the Final Pretrial Order, and the parties are cautioned that the 14 standard will be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses that a 15 party does not intend to offer will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes. 16 17 Counsel shall produce all trial exhibits to Casey Schultz, the Courtroom Deputy, no later than 3:00 p.m. on the Friday before trial. 18 19 Failure to comply with Local Rule 281, as modified by this order, may be grounds for sanctions. 20 The parties also are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of 21 Civil Procedure it will be their duty at the Final Pretrial Conference to aid the court in: (a) the 22 formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination of frivolous claims or defenses; (b) 23 the settling of facts that should properly be admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary proof 24 and cumulative evidence. Counsel must cooperatively prepare the joint Final Pretrial Conference 25 Statement and participate in good faith at the Final Pretrial Conference with these aims in mind.1 26 1 27 28 “If the pretrial conference discloses that no material facts are in dispute and that the undisputed facts entitle one of the parties to judgment as a matter of law,” the court may summarily dispose of the case or claims. Portsmouth Square v. S’holders Protective Comm., 770 F.2d 866, 868-69 (9th Cir. 1985). 7 1 A failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions, which may include monetary 2 sanctions, orders precluding proof, elimination of claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as 3 the court deems appropriate. 4 Concurrently with the filing of the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement, 5 counsel shall submit to chambers the word processable version of the Statement, in its entirety 6 (including the witness and exhibit lists) to: kjmorders@caed.uscourts.gov. 7 IX. 8 9 TRIAL SETTING The trial is set for January 5, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. The parties estimate a trial length of up to four (4) days. Trial briefs are due by December 22, 2014. Defendant Kohanbash has 10 requested a jury trial. 11 X. 12 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE The parties have expressed interest in appearing for settlement conference. A settlement 13 conference is scheduled before Judge Kendall J. Newman for November 12, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. in 14 Courtroom No. 25, 8th Floor. 15 The parties are directed to submit their confidential settlement conference statements to 16 the Court using the following email address: kjnorders@caed.uscourts.gov. If a party desires to 17 share additional confidential information with the Court, they may do so pursuant to the 18 provisions of Local Rule 270(d) and (e). Statements are due at least seven (7) days prior to the 19 Settlement Conference. Each party is reminded of the requirement that it be represented in 20 person at the settlement conference by a person able to dispose of the case or fully authorized to 21 settle the matter at the settlement conference on any terms. See Local Rule 270. 22 XI. 23 MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 24 Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court 25 upon a showing of good cause. Agreement by the parties pursuant to stipulation alone does not 26 constitute good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or 27 counsel does not constitute good cause. 28 ///// 8 1 2 3 4 5 XII. OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 23, 2013. 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?