California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Nor-Cal Beverage Company, Inc et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER 14 for Dismissal signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/6/2014. Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance's claims against defendants Nor-Cal Beverage Co. Inc., Jason Graviet, and Paul Orebaugh, as set forth in C SPA's 60-Day Notice Letter and Complaint, arehereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Each side shall bear their own attorney fees and costs, except as provided for by the terms of the accompanying Consent Agreement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Court shall retain and have jurisdiction over parties with respect to disputes arising under Consent Agreement attached to parties Stipulation to Dismiss as Exhibit A until 1/1/2016. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ANDREW L. PACKARD (State Bar No. 168690) LAURIE A. MIKKELSEN (State Bar No. 260313) Law Offices of Andrew L. Packard 100 Petaluma Blvd. N., Suite 301 Petaluma, CA 94952 Tel: (707) 763-7227 Fax: (707) 763-9227 E-mail: Andrew@packardlawoffices.com Laurie@packardlawoffices.com Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTER DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation, Case No. 13-cv-00902-JAM-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 15 16 17 NOR-CAL BEVERAGE CO. INC., a California corporation, JASON GRAVIET, STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(2)] and PAUL OREBAUGH, Defendants. 18 19 20 Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (“CSPA”) and Defendants in the above-captioned action, stipulate as follows: 21 WHEREAS, on or about March 4, 2013, CSPA provided Defendants with a Notice of 22 Violations and Intent to File Suit (“60-Day Notice Letter”) under Section 505 of the Federal 23 Water Pollution Control Act (“Act” or “Clean Water Act”), 33 U.S.C. § 1365; 24 WHEREAS, on May 8, 2013, CSPA filed its Complaint against Defendants in this 25 Court, and said Complaint incorporated by reference all of the allegations contained in 26 CSPA’s 60-Day Notice Letter; 27 28 WHEREAS, CSPA and Defendants, through their authorized representatives and without either adjudication of CSPA’s claims or admission by Defendants of any alleged -1STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL Case No. 13-cv-00902-JAM-EFB 1 violation or other wrongdoing, have chosen to resolve in full by way of settlement the 2 allegations of CSPA as set forth in CSPA’s 60-Day Notice Letter and Complaint, thereby 3 avoiding the costs and uncertainties of further litigation. A copy of the Parties’ proposed 4 consent agreement (“Consent Agreement”) entered into by and between CSPA and 5 Defendants is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference; 6 7 8 WHEREAS, CSPA has submitted the Consent Agreement via certified mail, return receipt requested, to the U.S. EPA and the U.S. Department of Justice (“the agencies”) and the 45-day review period set forth at 40 C.F.R. § 135.5 has now expired; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between 9 10 11 the Parties that CSPA’s claims, as set forth in its 60-Day Notice Letter and Complaint, be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The Parties respectfully request an order from this Court dismissing such claims with prejudice. In 12 accordance with Paragraph 18 of the Consent Agreement, the Parties also request that this 13 Court retain and have jurisdiction over the Parties through January 1, 2016, for the sole 14 purpose of resolving any disputes between the Parties with respect to enforcement of any 15 provision of the Consent Agreement. 16 Dated: March 6, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 17 LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD 18 19 By: /s/ Andrew L. Packard______________ Andrew L. Packard Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 20 21 22 23 Dated: March 6, 2014 24 KRONICK MOSCOVITZ TIEDEMANN & GIRARD By: /s/ Eric Robinson_______ (As authorized by L.R. 131) Attorneys for Defendants NOR-CAL BEVERAGE CO. INC., JASON 25 26 GRAVIET, and PAUL OREBAUGH 27 28 -2STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL Case No. 13-cv-00902-JAM-EFB 1 ORDER 2 3 4 5 6 Good cause appearing, and the Parties having stipulated and agreed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance’s claims against Defendants NOR-CAL BEVERAGE CO. INC., JASON GRAVIET, and PAUL OREBAUGH, as set forth in CSPA’s 60-Day Notice Letter and Complaint, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, each side to bear their own attorney fees and costs, except 7 8 9 10 11 as provided for by the terms of the accompanying Consent Agreement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain and have jurisdiction over the Parties with respect to disputes arising under the Consent Agreement attached to the Parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss as Exhibit A until January 1, 2016. IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Dated: 3/6/2014 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL Case No. 13-cv-00902-JAM-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?