Clayton v. Automated Gaming Technologies, Inc.
Filing
141
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/6/2014 ORDERING 55 Motion to Compel GRANTED as follows: AGT shall produce the stock ledger demanded in Request N0.5. AGT shall produce the employment and compensation agreements of all of its officers and directors demanded in Request No. 7. AGT shall produce all of its accounting ledgers and accounting journals demanded in Request No. 11, including but not limited to any in "Quickbooks" or other electronic form.AGT shall produ ce all documents demanded in Request No. 13; AGT shall produce all documents demanded in Request No. 14. This includes,without limitation, all invoices issued by AGT for such sales, and all invoices to AGT for its costs of sales. AGT shall produce al l documents demanded in, respectively, Requests Nos. 16, 17,20, 23, 24. 36, 37, and 38.Except with respectto Request No. 14 (which specifically referred to AGT's understanding of the term "Systems Division"), the production of document s under each of the foregoing Requests shall not be limited to those that AGT's deems to relate to the "Systems Division," (or "Systems Department") of AGT, but shall include all the documents demandedby the respective reques t. To the extent that the documents heretofore produced by AGT constitute full production of all documents demanded in a particular request which is a subject of this Order, or the further production hereby ordered as to one particular Request which is a subject of this Orderconstitutes full production of another such Request, AGT shall so certify or declare under penalty of perjury. AGT shall comply with this Order by August 13, 2014. (Waggoner, D)
1
2
3
4
5
GILBERT J. PREMO
Attorney at Law (Bar No. 48503)
500 Northfield Lane
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 974-6664
Facsimile: (415) 762-5350
gilbertpremo@gmail.com
Attorney for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
KEITH R. CLAYTON
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
Case No. 2:13-cv-00907-JAM-EFB
KEITH R CLAYTON,
Plaintiff
11
vs.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
[PROPOSED]
AUTOMATED GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF MOTION
TO COMPEL DEFENDANT AUTOMATED
INC. a Nevada corporation, et al.
GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. TO
PRODUCE DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO
Defendants.
--------------------------------------------------------- PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
AUTOMATED GAMING TECHNOLOGIES,
Date: July 30, 2014
INC., a Nevada corporation,
Time: 10:30 a.m.
Judge: Hon. Edmund F. Brennan
Counter-Claimant
Courtroom 8, 13th Floor
v.
KEITH R. CLAYTON, and DOES 1
Through 10, inclusive,
20
Counter-Defendants.
21
22
The motion of plaintiff and counter-defendant Keith R. Clayton (“plaintiff”) for an
23
order compelling defendant and cross-complainant Automated Gaming Technologies, Inc.
24
("AGT") to produce the documents requested in Plaintiff's First Request for Production of
25
Documents to Defendant (the "Document Request") came on regularly for hearing on July 30,
26
2014, at 10:00 am., in the above-entitled Court.
27
plaintiff, and Katie Konz, Esq. and Christopher B. Burton, Esq. of Downey Brand LLP
28
appeared as counsel for AGT.
Gilbert J. Premo appeared as counsel for
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
1
Order Granting Motion to Compel re Plaintiff's First Document Request
1
Remaining at issue at the time of the hearing of the motion were Requests Nos. 5, 7, 11,
2
13, 14, 15, 17, 20, 23, 24, 36, 37 and 38 of the Document Request. The Court having read and
3
considered the papers submitted by the parties, and heard the arguments of counsel, and good
4
cause therefor appearing, plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED as to all said Requests, and the Court
5
ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
6
1.
7
2.
8
AGT shall produce the employment and compensation agreements of all of its
officers and directors demanded in Request No. 7.
9
10
AGT shall produce the stock ledger demanded in Request No. 5.
3.
AGT shall produce all of its accounting ledgers and accounting journals demanded
in Request No. 11, including but not limited to any in "Quickbooks" or other electronic form.
11
4. AGT shall produce all documents demanded in Request No. 13.
12
5.
AGT shall produce all documents demanded in Request No. 14. This includes,
13
without limitation, all invoices issued by AGT for such sales, and all invoices to AGT for its
14
costs of sales.
6. AGT shall produce all documents demanded in, respectively, Requests Nos. 16, 17,
15
16
20, 23, 24. 36, 37, and 38.
17
Except with respect to Request No. 14 (which specifically referred to AGT's
18
understanding of the term "Systems Division"), the production of documents under each of the
19
foregoing Requests shall not be limited to those that AGT's deems to relate to the "Systems
20
Division," (or "Systems Department") of AGT, but shall include all the documents demanded
21
by the respective request.
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
2
Order Granting Motion to Compel re Plaintiff's First Document Request
1
To the extent that the documents heretofore produced by AGT constitute full production
2
of all documents demanded in a particular request which is a subject of this Order, or the
3
further production hereby ordered as to one particular Request which is a subject of this Order
4
constitutes full production of another such Request, AGT shall so certify or declare under
5
penalty of perjury.
6
AGT shall comply with this Order by August 13, 2014.
7
As modified above, it is so ordered.
8
9
10
11
Dated: August 6, 2014.
______________________________________________
EDMUND F. BRENNAN
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
3
Order Granting Motion to Compel re Plaintiff's First Document Request
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?