Clayton v. Automated Gaming Technologies, Inc.

Filing 141

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/6/2014 ORDERING 55 Motion to Compel GRANTED as follows: AGT shall produce the stock ledger demanded in Request N0.5. AGT shall produce the employment and compensation agreements of all of its officers and directors demanded in Request No. 7. AGT shall produce all of its accounting ledgers and accounting journals demanded in Request No. 11, including but not limited to any in "Quickbooks" or other electronic form.AGT shall produ ce all documents demanded in Request No. 13; AGT shall produce all documents demanded in Request No. 14. This includes,without limitation, all invoices issued by AGT for such sales, and all invoices to AGT for its costs of sales. AGT shall produce al l documents demanded in, respectively, Requests Nos. 16, 17,20, 23, 24. 36, 37, and 38.Except with respectto Request No. 14 (which specifically referred to AGT's understanding of the term "Systems Division"), the production of document s under each of the foregoing Requests shall not be limited to those that AGT's deems to relate to the "Systems Division," (or "Systems Department") of AGT, but shall include all the documents demandedby the respective reques t. To the extent that the documents heretofore produced by AGT constitute full production of all documents demanded in a particular request which is a subject of this Order, or the further production hereby ordered as to one particular Request which is a subject of this Orderconstitutes full production of another such Request, AGT shall so certify or declare under penalty of perjury. AGT shall comply with this Order by August 13, 2014. (Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 GILBERT J. PREMO Attorney at Law (Bar No. 48503) 500 Northfield Lane San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 974-6664 Facsimile: (415) 762-5350 gilbertpremo@gmail.com Attorney for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant KEITH R. CLAYTON 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:13-cv-00907-JAM-EFB KEITH R CLAYTON, Plaintiff 11 vs. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [PROPOSED] AUTOMATED GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT AUTOMATED INC. a Nevada corporation, et al. GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO Defendants. --------------------------------------------------------- PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AUTOMATED GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, Date: July 30, 2014 INC., a Nevada corporation, Time: 10:30 a.m. Judge: Hon. Edmund F. Brennan Counter-Claimant Courtroom 8, 13th Floor v. KEITH R. CLAYTON, and DOES 1 Through 10, inclusive, 20 Counter-Defendants. 21 22 The motion of plaintiff and counter-defendant Keith R. Clayton (“plaintiff”) for an 23 order compelling defendant and cross-complainant Automated Gaming Technologies, Inc. 24 ("AGT") to produce the documents requested in Plaintiff's First Request for Production of 25 Documents to Defendant (the "Document Request") came on regularly for hearing on July 30, 26 2014, at 10:00 am., in the above-entitled Court. 27 plaintiff, and Katie Konz, Esq. and Christopher B. Burton, Esq. of Downey Brand LLP 28 appeared as counsel for AGT. Gilbert J. Premo appeared as counsel for ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Order Granting Motion to Compel re Plaintiff's First Document Request 1 Remaining at issue at the time of the hearing of the motion were Requests Nos. 5, 7, 11, 2 13, 14, 15, 17, 20, 23, 24, 36, 37 and 38 of the Document Request. The Court having read and 3 considered the papers submitted by the parties, and heard the arguments of counsel, and good 4 cause therefor appearing, plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED as to all said Requests, and the Court 5 ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 6 1. 7 2. 8 AGT shall produce the employment and compensation agreements of all of its officers and directors demanded in Request No. 7. 9 10 AGT shall produce the stock ledger demanded in Request No. 5. 3. AGT shall produce all of its accounting ledgers and accounting journals demanded in Request No. 11, including but not limited to any in "Quickbooks" or other electronic form. 11 4. AGT shall produce all documents demanded in Request No. 13. 12 5. AGT shall produce all documents demanded in Request No. 14. This includes, 13 without limitation, all invoices issued by AGT for such sales, and all invoices to AGT for its 14 costs of sales. 6. AGT shall produce all documents demanded in, respectively, Requests Nos. 16, 17, 15 16 20, 23, 24. 36, 37, and 38. 17 Except with respect to Request No. 14 (which specifically referred to AGT's 18 understanding of the term "Systems Division"), the production of documents under each of the 19 foregoing Requests shall not be limited to those that AGT's deems to relate to the "Systems 20 Division," (or "Systems Department") of AGT, but shall include all the documents demanded 21 by the respective request. 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 Order Granting Motion to Compel re Plaintiff's First Document Request 1 To the extent that the documents heretofore produced by AGT constitute full production 2 of all documents demanded in a particular request which is a subject of this Order, or the 3 further production hereby ordered as to one particular Request which is a subject of this Order 4 constitutes full production of another such Request, AGT shall so certify or declare under 5 penalty of perjury. 6 AGT shall comply with this Order by August 13, 2014. 7 As modified above, it is so ordered. 8 9 10 11 Dated: August 6, 2014. ______________________________________________ EDMUND F. BRENNAN United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3 Order Granting Motion to Compel re Plaintiff's First Document Request

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?