Clayton v. Automated Gaming Technologies, Inc.

Filing 226

ORDER ENFORCING JUDGMENT signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/10/17, ORDERING that pursuant to the Court's previous Order 221 , Clayton's 222 Motion to Enforce the Judgment is GRANTED. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KEITH R. CLAYTON,

12

15

2:13-cv-907-JAM-EFB

Plaintiff,

13
14

No.

v.

ORDER ENFORCING JUDGMENT

AUTOMATED GAMING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada
corporation, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17
The

18

Court

issued

an

order

on

October

15,

2015

ordering

19

Defendant Automated Gaming Technologies (“AGT”) to pay Plaintiff

20

Keith

21

payments.

10/15/15 Order, ECF No. 221.

22

AGT

to

23

become immediately due and payable by AGT to Clayton.”

24

The Order further states:

Clayton

fails

(“Clayton”)

make

an

$200,000.00

installment

in

several

installment

The Order states that if

payment,

“$200,000.00

Id. at 2.

25
26
27
28

shall

“[i]n the event of any such default in payment which
has continued for ten (10) or more days after such
written notice of default, Clayton may apply to the
Court . . . for entry of a[n] order against AGT that
it immediately pay to Clayton the entire remaining
unpaid balance of the originally agreed sum of
1

1

$200,000.00, interest on past due balances,
reasonable attorney fees incurred in obtaining
said order.

2
3

and
the

Id. at 2-3.
Clayton now moves to enforce the judgment. 1

4

ECF No. 222.

5

Clayton indicates in a declaration by his attorney that AGT has

6

not made the January 2017 installment payment as required by the

7

Court’s order.

8

an opposition to the motion, and any opposition by AGT was due on

9

April 4, 2017.

AGT has not filed

Pursuant to its previous Order, the Court GRANTS Clayton’s

10
11

Premo Decl. ¶ 6, ECF No. 224.

motion to enforce the judgment and orders as follows:
1. AGT must immediately pay the entire remaining unpaid balance

12
13

of

the

$200,000.00

judgment

to

Clayton,

plus

14

interest

thereon at the legal rate from January 27, 2017.
2. AGT shall pay Clayton $2,000.00 for his reasonable attorney

15

fees incurred in obtaining this enforcement order;

16

3. No

17

other

provisions

of

the

Order

or

of

the

Settlement

18

Agreement dated October 2, 2015, are hereby affected.

19

Court

20

Agreement, the October 15, 2015 Order, and this enforcement

21

order.

retains

jurisdiction

to

enforce

the

The

Settlement

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

Dated:

April 10, 2017

25
26
27
28

1

This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without
oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was
scheduled for April 8, 2016.
2