Clayton v. Automated Gaming Technologies, Inc.

Filing 30

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/17/13 ORDERING that Plaintiff Keith R. Clayton's counter-motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, a copy of which was attached to his counter-motion, is GRANTED. The said Second Amended Complaint is deemed filed July 10, 2013. Defendant shall have 20 days from July 10, 2013 to respond to the said Second Amended Complaint. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4

GILBERT J. PREMO
Attorney at Law, State Bar No. 48503
500 Northfield Lane
Lincoln, CA 95648-8321
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
email: [e-mail]

5
Attorney for Plaintiff Keith R. Clayton
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
KEITH R. CLAYTON,
11
12
13
14
15
16

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
AUTOMATED GAMING TECHNOLOGIES,
)
INC., a Nevada corporation, and DOE 1 through )
DOE 50, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants
)
)
_________________________________________ )

Case No. 2:13-CV-00907-JAM-EFB

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
COUNTER-MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Date: July 10, 2013
Time: 9:30 a.m.
Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez
Courtroom 6, 14th Floor

17
The counter-motion of plaintiff Keith R. Clayton for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint,
18
came on for hearing on July 10,2013, at 9:30 a.m. before the Honorable John A. Mendez, Judge of the
19
United States District Court, Eastern District of California, located at 501 I Street, Sacramento,
20
California. Gilbert J. Premo, Esq. appeared as counsel for plaintiff, and Anthony L. Vignolo, Esq., and
21
Katie Konz, Esq., of Downey Brand LLP appeared as counsel for defendant Automated Gaming
22
Technologies, Inc. (“defendant”). The motion was not opposed. Good cause therefor appearing, IT IS
23
HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
24
1. Plaintiff Keith R. Clayton’s counter-motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint,
25
a copy of which was attached to his counter-motion, is GRANTED;
26
2. The said Second Amended Complaint is deemed filed July 10, 2013;
27
//
28
Order Granting Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, Page 1

1
2

3. Defendant shall have twenty (20) days from July 10, 2013 to respond to the said Second
Amended Complaint.

3
4

Dated: July 17, 2013

5

/s/ John A. Mendez
JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge

6
7
8

APPROVED AS CONFORMING TO
THE COURT’S RULING

9
10
DOWNEY BRAND LLP
11
12
13
14

By/s/ Katie Konz
Katie Konz
Attorney for Defendant
AUTOMATED GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Dated: July 16, 2013

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Granting Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, Page 2