Clayton v. Automated Gaming Technologies, Inc.

Filing 73

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/8/14 re: 72 FURTHER EXTENDING Plaintiff's Time to Respond to Automated Gaming Technologies, Inc.'s Request for Production of Documents and Things, Set One. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5

GILBERT J. PREMO
Attorney at Law (Bar No. 48503)
500 Northfield Lane
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
KEITH R. CLAYTON

6
7
8
9
10

DOWNEY BRAND LLP
MATTHEW WEBER (Bar No. 227314)
KATIE KONZ (Bar No. 271436))
3425 Brookside Road, Suite A
Stockton, CA 95219-1757
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

11
12

Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant
AUTOMATED GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
and Defendants John R. Prather and Robert Magnanti

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
KEITH R CLAYTON, .

Case No. 2:13-cv-00907-JAM-EFB

16
Plaintiff

17
18
19
20

STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND
PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO RESPOND TO
AUTOMATED GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, AUTOMATED GAMING
INC. a Nevada corporation,
JOHN R. TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S REQUEST FOR
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND
PRATHER and ROBERT MAGNANTI,
THINGS, SET ONE
Defendants.
--------------------------------------------------------vs.

21
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM
22
23

It is hereby stipulated, by and between the parties thereto, through their respective

24

counsel, that the time for plaintiff Keith R. Clayton to respond to defendant "Automated

25

Gaming Technologies, Inc.'s Request For Production Of Documents And Things, Set One",

26

dated and served November 1, 2013, may be, and is hereby, further extended seven additional

27

days, from January 17, 2014 to and including Friday, January 24, 2014.

28

/////
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
1
STIPULATION FURTHER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO AGT'S FIRST DOCUMENT REQUEST

1

There has been two previous stipulated extensions of a total of forty-four (44) days.

2
DATED: January 6, 2014

DOWNEY BRAND LLP

3
4

By: /s/ Katie Konz________________________

5

KATIE KONZ
Attorney for Defendant and Counter-Claimant
AUTOMATED GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and
Defendants John R. Prather and Robert Magnanti

6
7
8

DATED: January 6, 2014

9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13

By: /s/ Gilbert J. Premo___________________
GILBERT J. PREMO
Attorney for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
KEITH R. CLAYTON

Dated: January 8, 2014

14
15

_________________________________________
EDMUND F. BRENNAN
United States Magistrate Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
2
STIPULATION FURTHER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO AGT'S FIRST DOCUMENT REQUEST