Hampton v. Virga et al
Filing
37
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/14/19 ADOPTING 36 Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 29 Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMES HAMPTON,
12
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-0923 JAM DB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
TIM VIRGA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On September 23, 2019, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 36). Neither
23
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
28
1. The findings and recommendations issued September 23, 2019 (ECF No. 36) are
ADOPTED in full;
1
1
2
3
2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies, filed October 31, 2018 (ECF No. 29), is GRANTED, and
3. This case is CLOSED.
4
5
6
7
DATED: November 14, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?