Hampton v. Virga et al

Filing 37

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/14/19 ADOPTING 36 Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 29 Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES HAMPTON, 12 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-0923 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER TIM VIRGA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 23, 2019, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 36). Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations issued September 23, 2019 (ECF No. 36) are ADOPTED in full; 1 1 2 3 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, filed October 31, 2018 (ECF No. 29), is GRANTED, and 3. This case is CLOSED. 4 5 6 7 DATED: November 14, 2019 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?