Goldsmith v. Cate et al
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/31/13: This action is dismissed without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMES K. GOLDSMITH,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
No. 2:13-cv-0943 KJN P
ORDER
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C.
18
§ 636(c). By order filed July 3, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within fourteen days,
19
why this action should not be dismissed. The fourteen day period has now expired, and plaintiff
20
has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
21
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.
22
See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
23
Dated: July 31, 2013
24
25
26
27
gold0943.fsc
28
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
