in re: Samuel T. Cox
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/29/15 ordering plaintiff is granted 30 days from the filing date of this order to file a complaint that complies with the requirements of the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff the court's form for filing a prisoner civil rights complaint, and the application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner.(Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SAMUEL T. COX,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-00945 AC P
v.
ORDER
UNKNOWN,
15
Defendant.
16
On May 8, 2013, plaintiff submitted a handwritten letter to the United States District
17
18
Court, Northern District of California, complaining of delays in obtaining refills for his
19
prescription medications. ECF No. 1. The Northern District informed plaintiff that he was
20
required to pay the filing fee or obtain in forma pauperis status before the court could consider his
21
initial filing. ECF No. 3. Additionally, because plaintiff was challenging conditions of his
22
confinement at nearby Folsom State Prison, the case was transferred to this court. Plaintiff did
23
not respond to the Northern District’s previous instructions. Plaintiff is now incarcerated at
24
California State Prison Sacramento (CSP-SAC).1
Plaintiff is informed that he cannot proceed with an action in this court unless he files a
25
26
27
28
1
Plaintiff’s present place of incarceration is identified in the Inmate Locator website operated by
the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. See Fed. R. Evid. 201 (court may
take judicial notice of facts that are capable of accurate determination by sources whose accuracy
cannot reasonably be questioned); see also http://inmatelocator.cdcr.ca.gov/search.aspx.
1
1
complaint that conforms with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules, and pays the
2
filing fee to commence this action or is granted in forma pauperis status pursuant to a properly
3
completed application.
4
Plaintiff’s letter does not qualify as a complaint, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), and he cannot
5
commence a civil action without filing a proper complaint, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 3. Plaintiff is
6
informed that a proper complaint must name the defendant or defendants (“Unknown” is not a
7
proper defendant),2 and that a complaint premised on allegedly inadequate medical care must
8
allege facts supporting a plausible claim that defendant was deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s
9
serious medical needs. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009); Johnson v. Duffy, 588
10
F.2d 740, 743-44 (9th Cir. 1978); see also Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994) (plaintiff
11
must allege facts supporting a reasonable inference that a specific prison official knew of and
12
disregarded an excessive risk to plaintiff’s health; “the official must both be aware of the facts
13
from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and he
14
must also draw the inference.”).
15
Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to file a proper complaint, and to submit an
16
application requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee of $400.00
17
($350.00 plus the $50.00 administrative fee).3 See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a).
18
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
19
1. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the filing date of this order to file a complaint that
20
complies with the requirements of the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and
21
the Local Rules. The complaint must bear the docket number assigned this case. Plaintiff shall
22
2
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff is further advised that the use of “Doe” defendants is not favored in the Ninth Circuit.
See Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980). Where the identity of a defendant
cannot be known prior to the filing of a complaint, plaintiff should be given an opportunity
through discovery to identify the defendant, Wakefield v. Thompson, 177 F.3d 1160, 1163 (9th
Cir. 1999), and may then move to file an amended complaint to add the newly-named defendant,
Brass v. County of Los Angeles, 328 F.3d 1192, 1195-98 (9th Cir. 2003). However, in the instant
case, plaintiff has been accorded sufficient time since the submission of his May 2013 letter to
identify one or more defendants allegedly responsible for the delay in plaintiff’s prescription
medications.
3
Litigants proceeding in forma pauperis are not required to pay the $50.00 administrative fee. If
leave to file in forma pauperis is granted, plaintiff will be required to pay a filing fee of $350.00,
but will be allowed to pay the fee in installments.
2
1
also submit, within thirty days from the filing date of this order, an application to proceed in
2
forma pauperis on the form provided herewith, or pay the required filing fee.
3
4
5
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff the court’s form for filing a prisoner
civil rights complaint, and the application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner.
3. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this
6
action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(b).
7
DATED: January 29, 2015
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?