in re: Samuel T. Cox

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/31/15 ordering this matter is dismissed without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SAMUEL T. COX,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:13-cv-00945 AC P

v.

ORDER

UNKNOWN,

15

Defendant.

16
17

By order filed January 30, 2015, plaintiff was informed that, to commence this matter as a

18

civil action in this court, he must, within thirty days, file a complaint; plaintiff was also informed

19

that he had the option of submitting an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing

20

fee. See ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was informed that failure to comply with the court’s order would

21

result in the dismissal of this matter without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil

22

Procedure 41(b). Review of the Inmate Locator website operated by the California Department of

23

Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) indicates that plaintiff remains incarcerated at California

24

State Prison-Sacramento (CSP-SAC),1 where the court’s order was served on plaintiff. However,

25

plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order, and time for doing so has expired.

26
27
28

1

See http://inmatelocator.cdcr.ca.gov/search.aspx. See also Fed. R. Evid. 201 (court may take
judicial notice of facts that are capable of accurate determination by sources whose accuracy
cannot reasonably be questioned).
1

1
2

Accordingly, this matter is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
DATED: March 31, 2015

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2