McCoy v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/6/2015 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 25 are ADOPTED in FULL; plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED; defendant's 22 cross motion for summary judgmemt is GRANTED; and the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRUCE MCCOY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:13-cv-0952 JAM DAD PS v. ORDER CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 This action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636 18 19 and Local Rules 302(c)(15) and (c)(21). On February 05, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the 23 findings and recommendations. The fourteen day period has expired, and no party has filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 26 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 05, 2015 (Dkt. No. 25) are adopted in full; 4 2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 11) is denied; 5 3. Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 22) is granted; and 6 4. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed. 7 DATED: March 6, 2015 8 John A. Mendez______________________________ 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 /mccoy0952 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?