Manago v. Beard et al

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/16/2015 DENYING as moot plaintiff's 25 motion for judicial intervention. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

STEWART MANAGO,

12
13
14

No. 2:13-cv-0956 MCE DAD P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

JEFFREY A. BEARD et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion for “judicial intervention.”

18

Essentially, plaintiff asks the court to screen his amended complaint and rule on his motion for

19

appointment of counsel. At the time plaintiff filed the pending motion, he did not have the

20

benefit of this court’s recent order screening his complaint and denying his request for

21

appointment of counsel. That court order, issued on September 30, 2015, renders plaintiff’s

22

pending motion moot.

23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for judicial intervention

24

(Doc. No. 25) is denied as having been rendered moot.

25

Dated: October 16, 2015

26
27

DAD:9
mana0956.ji

28
1