Holsey v. Knipp

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/15/13 ORDERING that 6 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are VACATED; The Federal Defender is appointed to represent petitioner; The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of the petit ion and this order on David Porter, Assistant Federal Defender. Within thirty days of this order, the parties shall file a joint scheduling statement. Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order, the consent/reassignment form contemplated by Appendix A(k) to the Local Rules of this court together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General. (cc Michael Farrell)(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEROY DALE HOLSEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-0962 GGH P v. ORDER WILLIAM KNIPP, 15 Defendants. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for a 17 18 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In light of the complexity of the legal issues involved and the length of petitioner’s 19 20 sentence, the court has determined that the interests of justice require appointment of counsel. 21 See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Petitioner has filed a request to dismiss his case, followed by a request for permission to 22 23 exhaust state court remedies. (Doc. Nos. 8, 9.) In light of the appointment, the undersigned will 24 vacate the findings and recommendations issued June 18, 2013, which had recommended 25 dismissal for failure to exhaust, and petitioner will be given the opportunity to exhaust in 26 accordance with the directives outlined below. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations issued June 18, 2013 are vacated;1 3 2. The Federal Defender is appointed to represent petitioner; 4 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of the petition and this order on 5 David Porter, Assistant Federal Defender. 6 7 4. Within thirty days of this order, the parties shall file a joint scheduling statement which addresses the timing and order of the following matters: a. The number of days petitioner’s counsel estimates it will take to file either: 8 9 10 1. A statement indicating petitioner will stand on the existing petition, and supplemental memorandum of points and authorities, if any; 11 2. An amended petition which will proceed on exhausted claims only; or 12 3. An amended petition which identifies both exhausted and unexhausted 13 claims, demonstrates good cause for having failed to exhaust state court remedies as to any 14 claims,2 and any intention to pursue unexhausted claims, after which the court may recommend 15 that the proceedings be held in abeyance while petitioner exhausts any new claims in state court. 16 b. Discovery and investigations; 17 c. Anticipated motions; 18 d. The need for and timing of an evidentiary hearing; 19 e. Enumeration and resolution of unexhausted claims; and 20 f. Possible future amendments to the pleadings. 21 Counsel are reminded of the importance of timely filing a joint scheduling statement. Failure to 22 do so may result in sanctions. 23 5. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order, the consent/reassignment form 24 contemplated by Appendix A(k) to the Local Rules of this court together with a copy of the 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 28 1 2 The order portion of the June 18, 2013 opinion is not affected by this order. Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269, 125 S. Ct. 1528 (2005). 2 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Michael Patrick Farrell, 2 Senior Assistant Attorney General. 3 Dated: July 15, 2013 4 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 5 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 110a.ggh 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?