Nguyen v. California Prison Health Service, et al.
Filing
56
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 09/27/2016 ADOPTING IN FULL 48 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING Defendant Elam's 32 Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend. The portion of the magistrate judge's 8/3/2016 findings and recommendations that recommended Plaintiff be granted 30 days to file his amended complaint is NOT ADOPTED AS MOOT. (Jackson, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NAM BA NGUYEN,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:13-cv-963-MCE-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA PRISON
HEALTHSERVICE, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
19
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
20
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On August 3, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
22
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
23
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 48. Neither
24
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff filed his amended
25
complaint on August 29, 2016. ECF No. 50.
26
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
27
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
28
ORDERED that:
1
1
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 3, 2016 (ECF No. 48), are ADOPTED
IN FULL;
3
4
2. Defendant Elam’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED with leave to amend;
and
5
3. The portion of the magistrate judge’s August 3, 2016 findings and recommendations
6
that recommended Plaintiff be granted 30 days to file his amended complaint is not adopted as
7
moot.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 27, 2016
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?