Nguyen v. California Prison Health Service, et al.

Filing 56

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 09/27/2016 ADOPTING IN FULL 48 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING Defendant Elam's 32 Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend. The portion of the magistrate judge's 8/3/2016 findings and recommendations that recommended Plaintiff be granted 30 days to file his amended complaint is NOT ADOPTED AS MOOT. (Jackson, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NAM BA NGUYEN, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:13-cv-963-MCE-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA PRISON HEALTHSERVICE, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On August 3, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 23 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 48. Neither 24 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff filed his amended 25 complaint on August 29, 2016. ECF No. 50. 26 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 27 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 28 ORDERED that: 1 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 3, 2016 (ECF No. 48), are ADOPTED IN FULL; 3 4 2. Defendant Elam’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED with leave to amend; and 5 3. The portion of the magistrate judge’s August 3, 2016 findings and recommendations 6 that recommended Plaintiff be granted 30 days to file his amended complaint is not adopted as 7 moot. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 27, 2016 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?