Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Snell et al
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/1/13 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed May 21, 2013 are adopted in full; and The above-entitled action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Solano. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST
COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
No. 2:13-cv-0970 KJM CKD PS
ORDER
v.
AMOS SNELL, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
19
Defendant, proceeding pro se, removed the above-entitled action from state court. The
matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under Local Rule 302(c)(21).
20
On May 21, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were
21
served on defendant and which contained notice to defendant that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendant has not filed objections to
23
the findings and recommendations.
24
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
25
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
26
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully
27
reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record
28
and by the proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 21, 2013 are adopted in full; and
3
2. The above-entitled action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California,
4
County of Solano.
5
DATED: August 1, 2013.
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?