Bunce v Ocwen
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/30/13 ORDERING that defendant's MOTION to DISMISS 25 is GRANTED; Plaintiff has twenty days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint, if plaintiff can do so consistent with the Court's previous Order of 7/17/13. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
----oo0oo----
11
12
JAMES V. BUNCE,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
No. CIV. 2:13-00976 WBS EFB
v.
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; and
DOES 1-10 inclusive,
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
----oo0oo---Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on
August 5, 2013, bringing claims for: (1) violation of the
California Homeowner Bill of Rights, Cal. Civ. Code. § 2923.55;
(2) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair
dealing; (3) negligence; and (4) violation of California Unfair
Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq.
(See FAC ¶¶ 20-64 (Docket No. 19).)
Defendant now moves to
dismiss the FAC pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6).
(Docket No. 25.)
Plaintiff has filed a statement of non-opposition to defendant’s
28
1
1
motion to dismiss.
2
3
(Docket No. 27.)
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant’s motion to
dismiss be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.
4
Plaintiff has twenty days from the date of this Order
5
to file an amended complaint, if plaintiff can do so consistent
6
with the court’s previous Order of July 17, 2013.
7
Dated:
September 30, 2013
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?