Nechitaylo v. Chen
Filing
43
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 12/17/2014 ORDERING 42 Status Conference Reset for 1/5/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
Irene Karbelashvili, State Bar Number 232223
Law Office of Irene Karbelashvili
12 South First Street, Suite 413
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone: (408) 295-0137
Fax: (408) 295-0142
5
6
Attorneys for ALEKSEY NECHITAYLO, Plaintiff
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
ALEKSEY NECHITAYLO,
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
LIAN C. CHEN, TRUSTEE OF THE
LIAN C. CHEN REVOCABLE TRUST,
ORBIT GAS STATION, and DOES 1
through 20 inclusive,
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:13-CV-00989-WBS-CKD
Civil Rights
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
STATUS CONFERENCE
.
19
Plaintiff Aleksey Nechitaylo and Defendant Lean C. Chen hereby jointly stipulate and
20
21
22
request through their attorneys of record as follows:
The Parties agree that the status conference scheduled on December 22, 2014, will be
continued to January 5, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. due to unavailability of Counsel for Plaintiff.
23
24
IT IS SO STIPULATED
25
26
27
28
Dated: December 15, 2014
/s/ Irene Karbelashvili
Irene Karbelashvili, Attorney for
Plaintiff ALEKSY NECHITAYLO
Case No. 2:13-CV-00989-WBS-CKD
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE
1|P a ge
1
2
Dated: December 15, 2014
3
/s/ Michael Welch
Michael Welch, Attorney for
Defendant LEAN C. CHEN
4
FILER’S ATTESTATION
5
6
7
Pursuant to Local Rule131(e), I hereby attest that on December 15, 2014, I, Irene
Karbelashvili, received the concurrence of Michael Welch, Esq. in the filing of this document.
8
9
By:
10
/s/ Irene Karbelashvili
IRENE KARBELASHVILI
11
12
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
Dated: December 17, 2014
14
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:13-CV-00989-WBS-CKD
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE
2|P a ge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?