Nechitaylo v. Chen

Filing 43

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 12/17/2014 ORDERING 42 Status Conference Reset for 1/5/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Irene Karbelashvili, State Bar Number 232223 Law Office of Irene Karbelashvili 12 South First Street, Suite 413 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 295-0137 Fax: (408) 295-0142 5 6 Attorneys for ALEKSEY NECHITAYLO, Plaintiff 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 ALEKSEY NECHITAYLO, Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 LIAN C. CHEN, TRUSTEE OF THE LIAN C. CHEN REVOCABLE TRUST, ORBIT GAS STATION, and DOES 1 through 20 inclusive, Defendants. 15 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:13-CV-00989-WBS-CKD Civil Rights STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE . 19 Plaintiff Aleksey Nechitaylo and Defendant Lean C. Chen hereby jointly stipulate and 20 21 22 request through their attorneys of record as follows: The Parties agree that the status conference scheduled on December 22, 2014, will be continued to January 5, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. due to unavailability of Counsel for Plaintiff. 23 24 IT IS SO STIPULATED 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 15, 2014 /s/ Irene Karbelashvili Irene Karbelashvili, Attorney for Plaintiff ALEKSY NECHITAYLO Case No. 2:13-CV-00989-WBS-CKD STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE 1|P a ge 1 2 Dated: December 15, 2014 3 /s/ Michael Welch Michael Welch, Attorney for Defendant LEAN C. CHEN 4 FILER’S ATTESTATION 5 6 7 Pursuant to Local Rule131(e), I hereby attest that on December 15, 2014, I, Irene Karbelashvili, received the concurrence of Michael Welch, Esq. in the filing of this document. 8 9 By: 10 /s/ Irene Karbelashvili IRENE KARBELASHVILI 11 12 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Dated: December 17, 2014 14 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:13-CV-00989-WBS-CKD STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE 2|P a ge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?