Ba v Holder, et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/28/2014 ORDERING 15 the case is held in ABEYANCE, the parties shall submit a statusreport on 1/24/2015. CASE STAYED (Reader, L)

Download PDF
5 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov 6 Attorneys for Defendants 1 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ABDOUL BA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., et al., Defendants. 16 ) ) Case No.: 2:13-cv-1005 MCE AC ) ) ) JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER ) RE: ABEYANCE ) ) ) ) 17 18 This is an immigration case in which plaintiff has challenged the denial of his 19 naturalization application by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS). Plaintiff has 20 recently been referred into removal proceedings. This Court’s jurisdiction to consider the 21 naturalization application is limited now that Plaintiff has been referred into proceedings. See 22 De Lara Bellajaro v. Schiltgen, 378 F.3d 1042, 1043, 44 (9th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, the 23 parties now stipulate to hold this matter in abeyance pending resolution of the removal 24 25 26 27 proceedings. The parties agree to file a status report on January 24, 2015. /// /// /// 28 1 1 The parties submit that this change in the jurisdictional posture of the case constitutes good cause 2 to support suspension of the Court’s scheduling order of January 3, 2014. 3 4 Dated: January 23, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 5 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 6 7 s/ Audrey B. Hemesath AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 8 9 s/ Clifford C. Chigbu CLIFFORD CHIGBU Attorney for the Plaintiff 10 11 12 13 14 15 ORDER 16 17 For the foregoing reasons, the case is held in abeyance. The parties shall submit a status 18 report on January 24, 2015. 19 Dated: January 28, 2014 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?