Ba v Holder, et al
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/28/2014 ORDERING 15 the case is held in ABEYANCE, the parties shall submit a statusreport on 1/24/2015. CASE STAYED (Reader, L)
5
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov
6
Attorneys for Defendants
1
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ABDOUL BA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., et al.,
Defendants.
16
)
) Case No.: 2:13-cv-1005 MCE AC
)
)
) JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
) RE: ABEYANCE
)
)
)
)
17
18
This is an immigration case in which plaintiff has challenged the denial of his
19
naturalization application by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS). Plaintiff has
20
recently been referred into removal proceedings. This Court’s jurisdiction to consider the
21
naturalization application is limited now that Plaintiff has been referred into proceedings. See
22
De Lara Bellajaro v. Schiltgen, 378 F.3d 1042, 1043, 44 (9th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, the
23
parties now stipulate to hold this matter in abeyance pending resolution of the removal
24
25
26
27
proceedings. The parties agree to file a status report on January 24, 2015.
///
///
///
28
1
1
The parties submit that this change in the jurisdictional posture of the case constitutes good cause
2
to support suspension of the Court’s scheduling order of January 3, 2014.
3
4
Dated: January 23, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
5
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
6
7
s/ Audrey B. Hemesath
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
8
9
s/ Clifford C. Chigbu
CLIFFORD CHIGBU
Attorney for the Plaintiff
10
11
12
13
14
15
ORDER
16
17
For the foregoing reasons, the case is held in abeyance. The parties shall submit a status
18
report on January 24, 2015.
19
Dated: January 28, 2014
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?