Ba v Holder, et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/27/15 re: 17 ORDERING the case to remain held in abeyance. The parties shall submit a status report no later than 4/15/16. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
5 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov 6 Attorneys for Defendants 1 2 3 4 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ABDOUL BA, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 v. ERIC HOLDER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:13-cv-1005 MCE AC STATUS REPORT; JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: ABEYANCE 16 17 18 19 20 21 This is an immigration case currently held in abeyance while plaintiff is in removal proceedings. The parties report that removal proceedings remain ongoing. Plaintiff’s next hearing date in immigration court is March 15, 2016. Because this Court’s jurisdiction to consider the merits of plaintiff’s naturalization application remains dependent on the outcome of 22 the removal proceedings, the parties stipulate to a continuance of the abeyance period, until April 23 15, 2016, at which time the parties will file a further status report. De Lara Bellajaro v. 24 Schiltgen, 378 F.3d 1042, 1043, 44 (9th Cir. 2004). 25 26 27 28 1 1 Dated: January 20, 2015 Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 3 s/ Audrey B. Hemesath AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 4 5 6 s/ Clifford Chigbu CLIFFORD CHIGBU Attorney for the Plaintiff 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER For the foregoing reasons, the case remains held in abeyance. The parties shall submit a status report no later than April 15, 2016. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 27, 2015 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?