Ba v Holder, et al
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/12/2016 ORDERING that this case remains held in abeyance. The parties shall submit a status report on 6/24/2018. (Zignago, K.)
5
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov
6
Attorneys for Defendants
1
2
3
4
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ABDOUL BA,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
v.
ERIC HOLDER, et al.,
Defendants.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:13-cv-1005 MCE AC
STATUS REPORT; JOINT
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
ABEYANCE
16
17
18
19
20
21
This is an immigration case currently held in abeyance while plaintiff is in removal
proceedings. The parties report that removal proceedings remain ongoing. Plaintiff’s next
hearing date in immigration court is May 24, 2018. Because this Court’s jurisdiction to consider
the merits of plaintiff’s naturalization application remains dependent on the outcome of the
22
removal proceedings, the parties stipulate to a continuance of the abeyance period, until June 24,
23
2018, at which time the parties will file a further status report. De Lara Bellajaro v. Schiltgen,
24
378 F.3d 1042, 1043, 44 (9th Cir. 2004).
25
26
27
28
1
1
Dated: April 1, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
2
3
s/ Audrey B. Hemesath
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
4
5
6
s/ Clifford Chigbu
CLIFFORD CHIGBU
Attorney for the Plaintiff
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER
For the foregoing reasons, the case remains held in abeyance. The parties shall submit a
status report on June 24, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 12, 2016
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?